I'm not saying it isn't old, I mean it's been in use since Vietnam. It's not as if the US Army drives around in M60 Pattons anymore
. It's even limited to two blades on it's rotor. But I think it's still a perfectly "serviceable" alternative as a supporting weapons platform, playing a close support role for the workhorse Apache's or groundforces. It can carry Hellfires (can't it?) and rockets, which should still be enough to take out most armour and entrenched infantry in use by any current "bandit nations". Yes, it's not cutting-edge, the Comanche has better performance and more toys & gadgets (including the silence and stealth), but when you're fighting opponents still mainly using Soviet-era arms (and not fighting a traditional war of attrition) then it still has it's uses. Kind of how any assault rifle is still serviceable compared to the new project, the OI- something (?). It's still as good as it ever was at blowing stuff up and killing, just not as surgical and quite as effective (not to mention expensive) as the next thing.
The Kiowa? Really? Does it even carry weapons? I always saw the Kiowa as more of a target aquisition/designation helicopter. A ground AWACS if you will. Though I haven't really read up on the subject, the Comanche didn't seem very specialised in recon to me. More of a stealthier hunter-killer thingie, to replace the venerable Cobra role if anything. Ok, thanks for clarifying.
If it breaks, you get to keep both pieces.