Oh my god
This isn't the first time they've tried this either. A similiar thing happened in 2002 with the SUPREME COURT CASE Kirk v. Louisiana.
And concerning the Gould case, there are quite a few things in there that the police did that they aren't allowed to do by federal law.
------------------
Beware of music. It brings out the animosity in everyone.
[This message has been edited by Kieran Horn (edited March 30, 2004).]
This isn't the first time they've tried this either. A similiar thing happened in 2002 with the SUPREME COURT CASE Kirk v. Louisiana.
And concerning the Gould case, there are quite a few things in there that the police did that they aren't allowed to do by federal law.
Quote:
That was the purpose of warrants!<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">"We have to have a legitimate problem to be there in the first place, and if we don't, we can't conduct the search," Defillo said.</font>
Quote:
And they just took away one of those checks and balances.<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">"There are checks and balances to make sure the criminal justice system works in an effective manner," Defillo said.</font>
------------------
Beware of music. It brings out the animosity in everyone.
[This message has been edited by Kieran Horn (edited March 30, 2004).]
Democracy: rule by the stupid