Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → How is Battlefront?
How is Battlefront?
2004-09-21, 11:39 AM #1
Question is in the title. I was thinking about maybe picking it up this afternoon for PC, but wanted to get some opinions on it first. How's the gameplay, graphics, etc.? Is it worth the $50 to get it? Will it be a memorable Star Wars gaming experience? Any Single Player aspect to it? I heard it only supported 32 players, disapointing considering BF1942 can support 64. I'll make my decision based on the replies to this thread.
GOOGLE FIND THESE SITES PLEASE KTHXBYE
http://www.stevebcartoons.com
http://www.kingcola.com
2004-09-21, 1:03 PM #2
Haven't had a chance to play it yet... I think it looks spiffy though.
2004-09-21, 1:04 PM #3
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/star-wars-battlefront/549770p1.html

Gamespy's got a preview, and it looks ok, but IGN didn't like it that much.

The game looks great, but I'll wait until Gamespy's review.
You could no more evade my wrath than you could your own shadow.
2004-09-21, 1:06 PM #4
Installing it now, Ill let you know what I think.
"If you watch television news, you will know less about the world than if you just drink gin straight out of the bottle."
--Garrison Keillor
2004-09-21, 1:09 PM #5
Cool i think i will get it. :D
I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
2004-09-21, 2:01 PM #6
I'm going to check out a few more reviews before I go get it.
Pissed Off?
2004-09-21, 2:42 PM #7
Quote:
Originally posted by LT_Winters
Gamespy's got a preview, and it looks ok, but IGN didn't like it that much.

An 8.5 plus an editor's choice award isn't liking it? Okay.

I really like this game, though it is kind of laggy at times :\ Maybe I'll draw something about it later.
Do not fire!
2004-09-21, 2:51 PM #8
Are there any decent bots, because there's no way in hell I'll ever get to multiplay it :(
A slightly more stripy Gee_4ce, and more than just Something British...

Visit the home of Corporal G on the Internets
2004-09-21, 2:53 PM #9
Quote:
Originally posted by Yoshimi
An 8.5 plus an editor's choice award isn't liking it? Okay.

i thought IGN gave it a 7.5 :confused:
2004-09-21, 2:57 PM #10
IGN gave the Xbox version an 8.5.
2004-09-21, 3:18 PM #11
Wow.

This game is great, not amazing, but great. Its like a fast paced battlefield 1942, with star wars stuff.. and better graphics. Really, really fun.
"If you watch television news, you will know less about the world than if you just drink gin straight out of the bottle."
--Garrison Keillor
2004-09-21, 3:19 PM #12
Oh, and its supports more than 32 players, I was in a 50 player battle on tatooine just a minute ago.
"If you watch television news, you will know less about the world than if you just drink gin straight out of the bottle."
--Garrison Keillor
2004-09-21, 3:39 PM #13
WILL poichase!
2004-09-21, 9:34 PM #14
i played the demo on the 4th disc of the trilogy set... (xbox demo)

i'm disappointed... not by the game but by the demo... it's meant for online play so why no xbox live support for the demo?

oh and the one level is on endor so if you have xbox feel free to shoot ewoks :)
eat right, exercise, die anyway
2004-09-21, 11:30 PM #15
Quote:
Originally posted by finity5
i thought IGN gave it a 7.5 :confused:

Quote:
Originally posted by money•bie
IGN gave the Xbox version an 8.5.

There really is no reason for the PC version to be rated lower. One of the complaints about it was aiming with a mouse as opposed to a controller, and I know how we all love using our keyboards and mice here, so it's a silly, stupid point.
Do not fire!
2004-09-22, 12:29 PM #16
This game is awesome. It looks surprisingly better in motion than it does in screenshots, and it's fun as hell.

The technique they use on the graphics looks really nice. It's blurred or something... I can't explain it, but the end result looks really good.

It controls similar to a console game, which in this case isn't much of a bad thing. It makes it simple and easy to get used to.

The singleplayer campaign is rather bland (much like BF1942), but it's still fun to play with. A nice touch they used is that, before each historical battle, is a clip from the movies. Doesn't add anything to the gameplay, but it's still a nice touch.

But Galactic Conquest is awesome. You choose a side, and then proceed to try to take over the galaxy, one planet at a time. And you gain bonuses from planets you already control.

Now, a few complaints.

For one, and most noticeable is the load screens. It starts as a view of the galaxy, then zooms in on a planet, zooms in on a portion of land, then finally zooms in on the battlefield the map takes place on. This is a pretty cool effect, except for the fact that you have to wait for it every time a map loads. In my case, the maps are loaded long before the load screen is done. Thankfully it's only for a couple of seconds, but it's still mildly frustrating.

Secondly, lack of weapon models. Again, this isn't a major problem (it's barely even noticeable), but it's annoying. What I mean is, some weapons recycle the same model. For example, the clonepilot shockrifle shares the same weapon model as the clonetrooper blaster rifle, and the darktrooper blastcannon looks like an E-11. meanwhile, most of the grenade/rocket launchers recycle the same 2 or 3 models. It's not much of a big deal, and I'm sure it will be eventually fixed in a patch/mod/expansion, but it's still annoying.

My third complaint is the fire sound for the E-11. It sounds nothing like it should. Again, minor problem, but in JK/JA/JO/whatever other game has an E-11, they all sound relatively the same, but the one in battlefront is completely different.

Anyways, those last three complaints were mostly cosmetic. They don't really affect the game much, so it's not a big deal. However...

I can't seem to find Galactic Conquest for MP. How could they leave that out? I mean, seriously, the coolest part of the game is left out of MP. Unless it's hidden somewhere and I'm unable to find it...

Overall, the game's worth it, for the most part. It's not OMGAMAZINGHL2DOOM3KILLAR!!111, but it's entertaining. I'm glad I bought it. And if anyone finds galactic conquest for MP, by all means, LET ME KNOW.

That is all.
Moo.
2004-09-22, 5:42 PM #17
Quote:
Originally posted by Yoshimi
There really is no reason for the PC version to be rated lower. One of the complaints about it was aiming with a mouse as opposed to a controller, and I know how we all love using our keyboards and mice here, so it's a silly, stupid point.


I'm an avid console gamer and even I know that the mouse is the best tool to use for aimming in any game.
2004-09-22, 5:54 PM #18
No way. When it comes to aiming, light guns > all.
"I got kicked off the high school debate team for saying 'Yeah? Well, **** you!'
... I thought I had won."
2004-09-22, 6:01 PM #19
Chaz wins. But light guns just aren't feasible to use in anything but Time Crisis and HotD.

Mouse > you.
D E A T H

↑ Up to the top!