I'm going through and responding to stuff as I see it, so I might respond to something that's already been answered.
I'm for Kerry, other people have done a good job of summarizing why, and I agree with them.
Gays are oppressed in the US. They are a minority. The parades allow them to stand together and support each other, something they need.
While I think that your opinion of it is contemptible, at least you're honest and do understand the rights they have.
Gay people can have children and should be able to adopt. Plus, there's a heck of a lot more to it than tax benefits.
Wrong. Our problems with the war in Iraq have nothing to do with us. Bush doesn't seem to care about the people there, but we do.
Of course, Bush and Cheney have also said that they need to be sensitive.
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=139030
Scroll down to where it says "Cheney's 'Sensitive' Hypocrisy"
Yes, those all seem honorable. He helped expose the atrocities being committed by the Americans in Vietnam.
If you think opposing the Vietnam war would have helped anyone's political career, then you obviously know nothing about it.
Wow, how incredibly courteous.
W
T
F
Sorry, but you are wrong. Can somebody else step up and explain why? I'm too shocked to do so.
He's got a sound enough reason. Matt, your assumption about Kerry is correct. You would agree with him more, but unfortunately, he's still pretty right-wing.
The democrats REALLY let us down with that. A lot of them signed it without even reading it.
Murder ends up with someone being hurt. Homosexuality doesn't.
It's definitely not worthless. Sex has worth besides reproduction.
Too bad they were intentionally used in places that also took out civilians.
I'm glad you care so much about the poor. If you think it's because they don't work hard enough, try telling that to a poor person, they'll have some words for you.
And no, they do not have it better off than the rich did. You apparently don't know much about the poor people in the US.