Part of my ISP for chemistry is to find scientific journals online and critique them. This is quite possibly the most worthless assignment ever, because I get questions like "What is the purpose of this experiment? What was the hypothesis? What was the conclusion? Why is this relevant?" but in all the journals I find they generally go like this "We were screwing around and then this happened, and this is what happened: blah blah blah, end of journal"
In school they make us write purpose, materials, abstract, hypothesis, discussion, conclusion, etc... apparently in the real world you don't have to follow any form, and you can just ramble on about irrelevant crap that happened while you were playing in the lab. What a waste of my time.
(The next part of the assignment is to read a romance novel and then discuss an aspect of chemistry in it, what a great project
)
In school they make us write purpose, materials, abstract, hypothesis, discussion, conclusion, etc... apparently in the real world you don't have to follow any form, and you can just ramble on about irrelevant crap that happened while you were playing in the lab. What a waste of my time.
(The next part of the assignment is to read a romance novel and then discuss an aspect of chemistry in it, what a great project
