Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → This was posted as a comment on my Blog
This was posted as a comment on my Blog
2004-11-16, 8:26 AM #1
Quote:
Dr. Schambaugh, of the University of Oklahoma School of Chemical Engineering, Final Exam question for May of 1997. Dr. Schambaugh is known for asking questions such as, "why do airplanes fly?" on his final exams. His one and only final exam question in May 1997 for his Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer II class was: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with proof."

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

"First, We postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.

Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, then you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Two options exist:

If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
If hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.
So which is it? If we accept the quote given to me by Theresa Manyan during Freshman year, "that it will be a cold night in hell before I sleep with you" and take into account the fact that I still have NOT succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then Option 2 cannot be true...Thus, hell is exothermic."

The student, Tim Graham, got the only A.
I don't care if you think this is old news, it's new to me.
Detty. Professional Expert.
Flickr Twitter
2004-11-16, 8:31 AM #2
that kid is smart... damn
2004-11-16, 8:39 AM #3
I love that kid now.
:D


Then of course there's also the story of the Philosophy final that was a single question: "Why?"

One kid simply writes "Why not?"

Probable untrue, but fun nonetheless.
Ban Jin!
Nobody really needs work when you have awesome. - xhuxus
2004-11-16, 8:40 AM #4
I have seen in before, but it never gets old :)
2004-11-16, 8:48 AM #5
Now that is what you call a damn good answer! :D

-Jackpot

(so it's "new news" to me ;) - still made me smile! :))
"lucky_jackpot is the smily god..." -gothicX
"Life is mostly froth and bubble, but two things stand in stone,
Kindness in another's trouble, courage in your own"
- "Ye Wearie Wayfarer"
|| AI Builder: compatible with both JK & MotS || My website ||
2004-11-16, 8:48 AM #6
I've seen it before... I think on Bash.org

But it's still a great essay.

Slightly more detailed version.
Hazard a company one process.
2004-11-16, 9:15 AM #7
The only way to find out if a soul has mass, is to weigh some one before they, die and after. Like keep them in a closed environment while they are dieing and keep mass measurements all the time. That would work.
2004-11-16, 9:24 AM #8
Quote:
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet
The only way to find out if a soul has mass, is to weigh some one before they, die and after. Like keep them in a closed environment while they are dieing and keep mass measurements all the time. That would work.


People have actually done that.
"Those ****ing amateurs... You left your dog, you idiots!"
2004-11-16, 9:33 AM #9
Quote:
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet
The only way to find out if a soul has mass, is to weigh some one before they, die and after. Like keep them in a closed environment while they are dieing and keep mass measurements all the time. That would work.


Wasn't there a movie based on that?
Stuff
2004-11-16, 10:06 AM #10
Of course, if a soul somehow manages to have a negative mass, then all of that theory goes to naught. But anyway, that's very good. I have yet to actually have any exam questions as silly as that, but many of my subject matter questions have been worded rather strangely, or have been tied to other subjects that wouldn't seem as relevant. I recall one multiple-choice question that asked how men can help reduce their chances of an infertile relationship. The correct answer was "don't wear tight pants." :P
Wake up, George Lucas... The Matrix has you...
2004-11-16, 10:06 AM #11
Yea, 21 grams or something?
/fluffle
2004-11-16, 10:14 AM #12
One of my favourites.

Quote:
"Describe how to determine the height of a skyscraper with a barometer."

One student replied:

"You tie a long piece of string to the neck of the barometer, then lower the barometer from the roof of the skyscraper to the ground. The length of the string plus the length of the barometer will equal the height of the building."

While the answer was original, it so incensed the examiner that the student was failed immediately. The student appealed on the grounds that his answer was indisputably correct, and the university appointed an independent arbiter to decide the case.

The arbiter judged that the answer was indeed correct, but did not display any noticeable knowledge of physics. To resolve the problem it was decided to call the student in and allow him six minutes in which to provide a verbal answer which showed at least a minimal familiarity with the basic principles of physics.

For five minutes the student sat in silence, forehead creased in thought. The arbiter reminded him that time was running out, to which the student replied that he had several extremely relevant answers, but couldn't make up his mind which to use.

On being advised to hurry up the student replied as follows:

"Firstly, you could take the barometer up to the roof of the skyscraper, drop it over the edge, and measure the time it takes to reach the ground. The height of the building can then be worked out from the formula H = 0.5g x t squared. But bad luck on the barometer."

"Or, if the sun is shining, you could measure the height of the barometer, then set it on end and measure the length of its shadow. Then you measure the length of the skyscraper's shadow, and thereafter it is a simple matter of proportional arithmetic to work out the height of the skyscraper."

"But if you wanted to be highly scientific about it, you could tie a short piece of string to the barometer and swing it like a pendulum, first at ground level and then on the roof of the skyscraper. The height is worked out by the difference in the gravitational restoring force T = 2 Pi Sq Root (l / g)."

"Or, if the skyscraper has an outside emergency staircase, one could walk up the staircase and mark off the height of the skyscraper in barometer lengths and then add them up."

"If you merely wanted to be boring and orthodox about it, of course, you could use the barometer to measure the air pressure on the roof of the skyscraper and on the ground, and convert the difference in millibars into feet to give the height of the building."

"But since we are constantly being exhorted to exercise independence of mind and apply scientific methods, undoubtedly the best way would be to knock on the janitor's door and say to him 'If you would like a nice new barometer, I will give you this one if you will tell me the height of this skyscraper'."

The student was Niels Bohr, the only Dane to win the Nobel prize for Physics.
Hey, Blue? I'm loving the things you do. From the very first time, the fight you fight for will always be mine.
2004-11-16, 10:17 AM #13
Quote:
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet
The only way to find out if a soul has mass, is to weigh some one before they, die and after. Like keep them in a closed environment while they are dieing and keep mass measurements all the time. That would work.
But you also have to take into account weight loss from digestive processes, wherein mass of food is absorbed, and converted into energy, resulting in mass loss. If food intake is less than energy consumption, the person will weigh less.

Too bad we can't develop a diet plan based on that...
Catloaf, meet mouseloaf.
My music
2004-11-16, 10:37 AM #14
Quote:
Originally posted by Martyn
I have seen in before, but it never gets old :)


Same here. My high school chem teacher pased that out to his classes.
Pissed Off?

↑ Up to the top!