So in preperation for seeing Blade Trinity at our shiny new theatre (I haven't seen blade trinity yet, so no spoilers. Don't even talk about blade trinity, that's not what this thread is for) I picked the 2 prequels up at blockbuster, and I am wholly unimpressed.
From what people told me, the blade movies were the predecessors to the Matrix. I can completelly see this, what with all of the comic-book angles and such. That doesn't mean it was just as good at all.
While blade 1 was far more entertaining than 2, they still seemed overly action packed, with storylines that if examined deeper than the movie assumes, don't really make much sense at all. The second movie took these downfalls and harvested them into a ****tacular movie.
The concept of vampires has never really interested me. But being the Buffian that I am, I had to watch these movies. The vampirism in the movie seems like a catch for a bunch of emo kids, more than it is part of the action. The night clubs, blood baths, and buckets of blood ended up being more disgusting than alternative.
Buffy was a very shallow show, but enjoyable in it's early seasons, and absolute crap in it's later seasons. The same seems to be true with blade. The first movie, while shallow and lacking in character development and plot construction was a solid action and science-geeky flick. While the second was nothing but action, and lacked a plot all together.
The number one thing I simply could not excuse were all the one liners. For christ sakes, when being chased down by a pack of crazy vampire killing skinless... freaks, one doesn't have the wit or tact to whip out a handfull of one-liners. No one. This was also a downfall in the matrix trillogy as well.
Actually, I take that back: The number one thing were all the inconsistancies between the movies. It seemed we were thrown into the second movie assuming we'd never saw the first movie, and that it'd be ok to change some of the rules. Hey, suddenly there is no girl, and suddenly he's not rejecting the syrum. Suddenly, the old guy didn't shoot himself, and blade just happened to leave his body sitting in the chair, despite suiting himself up with a bunch of neato gadgets that were sitting on the tables down near the old guys body, yet the old guy was 'stolen' from blade? No. The inconsistancy of the 2 movies made not so strong movies even worse.
I was quite unimpressed, and had a lot of hopes in a new cult-classic I could latch myself onto. Instead I got a pair of Resident-Evil styled crap of film.
JediKirby
From what people told me, the blade movies were the predecessors to the Matrix. I can completelly see this, what with all of the comic-book angles and such. That doesn't mean it was just as good at all.
While blade 1 was far more entertaining than 2, they still seemed overly action packed, with storylines that if examined deeper than the movie assumes, don't really make much sense at all. The second movie took these downfalls and harvested them into a ****tacular movie.
The concept of vampires has never really interested me. But being the Buffian that I am, I had to watch these movies. The vampirism in the movie seems like a catch for a bunch of emo kids, more than it is part of the action. The night clubs, blood baths, and buckets of blood ended up being more disgusting than alternative.
Buffy was a very shallow show, but enjoyable in it's early seasons, and absolute crap in it's later seasons. The same seems to be true with blade. The first movie, while shallow and lacking in character development and plot construction was a solid action and science-geeky flick. While the second was nothing but action, and lacked a plot all together.
The number one thing I simply could not excuse were all the one liners. For christ sakes, when being chased down by a pack of crazy vampire killing skinless... freaks, one doesn't have the wit or tact to whip out a handfull of one-liners. No one. This was also a downfall in the matrix trillogy as well.
Actually, I take that back: The number one thing were all the inconsistancies between the movies. It seemed we were thrown into the second movie assuming we'd never saw the first movie, and that it'd be ok to change some of the rules. Hey, suddenly there is no girl, and suddenly he's not rejecting the syrum. Suddenly, the old guy didn't shoot himself, and blade just happened to leave his body sitting in the chair, despite suiting himself up with a bunch of neato gadgets that were sitting on the tables down near the old guys body, yet the old guy was 'stolen' from blade? No. The inconsistancy of the 2 movies made not so strong movies even worse.
I was quite unimpressed, and had a lot of hopes in a new cult-classic I could latch myself onto. Instead I got a pair of Resident-Evil styled crap of film.
JediKirby
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ