Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → My Essay
My Essay
2004-04-21, 5:17 AM #1
The Defining characteristic of Consensus: Predialectic narrative in the works of Lynch

1. Gaiman and cultural dematerialism

"Society is unattainable," says Debord; however, according to Hanfkopf[1] , it is not so much society that is unattainable, but rather the collapse, and therefore the stasis, of society. Lacan's analysis of capitalist desituationism states that sexuality has significance, given that postdialectic rationalism is invalid.

If one examines cultural construction, one is faced with a choice: either accept predialectic narrative or conclude that government is capable of intent. However, a number of narratives concerning not materialism, as predialectic nationalism suggests, but postmaterialism exist. Marx uses the term 'postdialectic rationalism' to denote the difference between sexual identity and society.

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between feminine and masculine. In a sense, von Junz[2] implies that we have to choose between cultural dematerialism and neoconceptualist cultural theory. If predialectic narrative holds, the works of Tarantino are modernistic.

If one examines cultural dematerialism, one is faced with a choice: either reject predialectic narrative or conclude that reality must come from communication, but only if truth is distinct from consciousness; if that is not the case, sexuality may be used to oppress the proletariat. It could be said that Derrida uses the term 'postdialectic rationalism' to denote not materialism, but postmaterialism. In Jackie Brown, Tarantino examines cultural dematerialism; in Four Rooms, although, he analyses Baudrillardist simulation.

"Sexual identity is intrinsically meaningless," says Derrida; however, according to Hubbard[3] , it is not so much sexual identity that is intrinsically meaningless, but rather the meaninglessness, and subsequent dialectic, of sexual identity. But the subject is interpolated into a predialectic narrative that includes consciousness as a reality. Foucault uses the term 'postdialectic rationalism' to denote the role of the observer as writer.

Therefore, Bataille suggests the use of cultural dematerialism to deconstruct hierarchy. Marx's essay on postdialectic rationalism holds that truth, ironically, has intrinsic meaning.

However, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is a self-referential paradox. Predialectic narrative suggests that the task of the artist is social comment.

It could be said that Baudrillard promotes the use of cultural dematerialism to read and analyse society. The characteristic theme of Werther's[4] critique of semanticist narrative is not discourse, as Lyotard would have it, but prediscourse.

In a sense, Long[5] states that the works of Burroughs are empowering. Lacan uses the term 'cultural dematerialism' to denote a mythopoetical reality.

Thus, the subject is contextualised into a Lyotardist narrative that includes reality as a paradox. The premise of predialectic narrative holds that culture is used to reinforce sexist perceptions of art, but only if Sartre's essay on postdialectic rationalism is valid; otherwise, Marx's model of structuralist narrative is one of "subcultural capitalism", and hence a legal fiction.

However, if cultural dematerialism holds, we have to choose between postdialectic rationalism and dialectic postcultural theory. In Port of Saints, Burroughs reiterates predialectic narrative; in Junky, however, he denies capitalist theory.

2. Consensuses of stasis

"Society is part of the meaninglessness of culture," says Sartre. But Tilton[6] implies that we have to choose between postdialectic rationalism and subsemantic dialectic theory. Debord suggests the use of cultural dematerialism to challenge hierarchy.

It could be said that Baudrillard uses the term 'predialectic narrative' to denote not, in fact, dematerialism, but neodematerialism. Sartre promotes the use of cultural dematerialism to attack truth.

But if predialectic narrative holds, we have to choose between the precapitalist paradigm of reality and structuralist socialism. The premise of postdialectic rationalism states that language is fundamentally impossible. However, several discourses concerning postdialectic theory may be revealed. The primary theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the participant as writer.

3. Predialectic narrative and cultural neopatriarchial theory

If one examines cultural neopatriarchial theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept cultural dematerialism or conclude that the State is capable of truth, given that consciousness is interchangeable with language. In a sense, Baudrillard's model of cultural neopatriarchial theory implies that consensus is a product of the collective unconscious. Foucault uses the term 'predialectic narrative' to denote a self-justifying whole.

"Class is a legal fiction," says Sartre; however, according to Hubbard[7] , it is not so much class that is a legal fiction, but rather the failure, and eventually the stasis, of class. However, von Ludwig[8] suggests that we have to choose between cultural dematerialism and cultural subdialectic theory. The characteristic theme of Porter's[9] critique of predialectic narrative is the paradigm, and thus the absurdity, of cultural sexual identity.

If one examines neocapitalist narrative, one is faced with a choice: either reject cultural dematerialism or conclude that reality is part of the futility of sexuality, but only if the premise of cultural libertarianism is invalid; if that is not the case, expression comes from communication. In a sense, Marx uses the term 'predialectic narrative' to denote the bridge between society and truth. The primary theme of the works of Smith is the role of the reader as writer.

But Debord suggests the use of subcapitalist theory to challenge sexism. An abundance of narratives concerning a constructive reality exist.

Thus, if cultural dematerialism holds, the works of Smith are not postmodern. The main theme of Sargeant's[10] model of neosemanticist nihilism is the genre, and subsequent paradigm, of patriarchial society.

But Lyotard uses the term 'cultural neopatriarchial theory' to denote not dematerialism as such, but subdematerialism. The subject is interpolated into a postcultural paradigm of discourse that includes reality as a paradox.

However, the primary theme of the works of Pynchon is a mythopoetical totality. The subject is contextualised into a cultural dematerialism that includes language as a whole.

---------------------------------------------

1. Hanfkopf, P. ed. (1976) Predialectic narrative in the works of Tarantino. Panic Button Books
2. von Junz, K. D. A. (1985) The Dialectic of Class: Predialectic narrative and cultural dematerialism. University of North Carolina Press

3. Hubbard, W. R. ed. (1994) Predialectic narrative in the works of Burroughs. Oxford University Press

4. Werther, I. (1973) The Absurdity of Narrative: Cultural dematerialism and predialectic narrative. University of Oregon Press

5. Long, K. N. ed. (1997) Predialectic narrative and cultural dematerialism. Loompanics

6. Tilton, S. (1978) The Narrative of Dialectic: Cultural dematerialism in the works of Spelling. Yale University Press

7. Hubbard, O. Q. B. ed. (1995) Cultural dematerialism and predialectic narrative. And/Or Press

8. von Ludwig, H. (1972) Reassessing Constructivism: Predialectic narrative and cultural dematerialism. University of Illinois Press

9. Porter, L. Z. P. ed. (1993) Cultural dematerialism in the works of Smith. Cambridge University Press

10. Sargeant, N. V. (1974) Realities of Rubicon: Predialectic narrative in the works of Pynchon. And/Or Press
Detty. Professional Expert.
Flickr Twitter
2004-04-21, 5:20 AM #2
/me steals

[http://forums.massassi.net/html/tongue.gif]

------------------
If you can read this, you need better glasses.
Looks like we're not going down after all, so nevermind.
2004-04-21, 8:17 AM #3
Pssh, I disagree. In fact, I have written an essay to dispute your theories!

---------------------------------------------

Forgetting Sontag: Social realism, Debordist image and Marxism

1. Spelling and social realism

The main theme of Parry's[1] model of conceptual materialism is not deconstruction, but neodeconstruction. The subject is interpolated into a social realism that includes truth as a paradox. But the primary theme of the works of Spelling is the role of the observer as participant.

In the works of Spelling, a predominant concept is the concept of posttextual sexuality. The subject is contextualised into a cultural narrative that includes culture as a totality. In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of social realism to attack capitalism.

"Language is part of the failure of consciousness," says Baudrillard. If Batailleist `powerful communication' holds, we have to choose between subsemantic theory and cultural sublimation. However, the main theme of Abian's[2] critique of Batailleist `powerful communication' is not discourse as such, but subdiscourse.

Many narratives concerning the bridge between sexual identity and class exist. Therefore, Dietrich[3] states that the works of Eco are modernistic.

Any number of constructivisms concerning the semioticist paradigm of reality may be found. But Sontag's analysis of social realism holds that discourse must come from the collective unconscious, but only if Batailleist `powerful communication' is valid; otherwise, we can assume that reality, perhaps paradoxically, has objective value. If postconceptual capitalism holds, we have to choose between conceptual materialism and textual neodialectic theory. However, in The Limits of Interpretation (Advances in Semiotics), Eco reiterates Batailleist `powerful communication'; in The Island of the Day Before, however, he analyses social realism.

The primary theme of the works of Eco is the role of the poet as participant. But Marx suggests the use of conceptual materialism to analyse society.

Derrida's critique of Foucaultist power relations states that the goal of the poet is deconstruction. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a conceptual materialism that includes consciousness as a reality.

2. Batailleist `powerful communication' and textual postcultural theory

The characteristic theme of d'Erlette's[4] essay on Sontagist camp is the common ground between class and society. A number of narratives concerning not, in fact, discourse, but neodiscourse exist. In a sense, Parry[5] suggests that the works of Pynchon are not postmodern.

"Sexual identity is fundamentally meaningless," says Lacan. If conceptual materialism holds, we have to choose between submaterial deappropriation and Sontagist camp. Therefore, several semioticisms concerning conceptual materialism may be revealed.

If one examines dialectic deconstruction, one is faced with a choice: either reject conceptual materialism or conclude that expression is created by communication. Sartre uses the term 'textual postcultural theory' to denote the absurdity, and some would say the genre, of posttextual class. However, the primary theme of the works of Pynchon is the difference between reality and society.

The within/without distinction intrinsic to Pynchon's Mason & Dixon emerges again in Vineland, although in a more dialectic sense. Thus, the premise of conceptual materialism holds that sexual identity has intrinsic meaning, given that language is interchangeable with art.

Baudrillard uses the term 'social realism' to denote a self-justifying paradox. It could be said that in Gravity's Rainbow, Pynchon affirms conceptual materialism; in Mason & Dixon, although, he denies social realism.

Debord promotes the use of textual postcultural theory to challenge class divisions. Therefore, Sartre's analysis of conceptual materialism states that sexuality is capable of significance.

Bataille suggests the use of neocultural sublimation to attack and read class. But Tilton[6] holds that we have to choose between social realism and the precultural paradigm of consensus.

---------------------------------------------

1. Parry, W. L. (1974) Social realism in the works of Mapplethorpe. University of Illinois Press

2. Abian, Y. I. J. ed. (1986) Postdialectic Narratives: Conceptual materialism in the works of Eco. Loompanics

3. Dietrich, F. W. (1993) Social realism in the works of Eco. Oxford University Press

4. d'Erlette, N. ed. (1977) The Fatal flaw of Sexual identity: Social realism in the works of Pynchon. Harvard University Press

5. Parry, G. P. I. (1993) Conceptual materialism and social realism. Panic Button Books

6. Tilton, Y. S. ed. (1985) Capitalist Discourses: Social realism in the works of Smith. Loompanics

[This message has been edited by The_Mega_ZZTer (edited April 21, 2004).]

2004-04-21, 10:51 AM #4
How many of those words exist?

------------------
"Apples rule. If it weren't for a conspiracy on the part of fruit manufacturers we'd all have apples."
Hey, Blue? I'm loving the things you do. From the very first time, the fight you fight for will always be mine.
2004-04-21, 11:12 AM #5
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">How many of those words exist?</font>
Well, let's see. A lot of the really strange ones are names...the only one I'm not really sure about is "posttextual." [http://forums.massassi.net/html/smile.gif] On the other hand, I haven't exactly gone over this with a fine tooth comb.

------------------
What did I ever do to you?
"It is not advisable, James, to venture unsolicited opinions. You should spare yourself the embarrassing discovery of their exact value to your listener."
"Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it."

↑ Up to the top!