I wish someone would burn the damn college down.
My illustrious English 3 teacher assigned an essay assignment. Normally this would not be a problem, as i can pull a fairly decent essay out of my a** (not literally) every time and turn it in without too much hassle. writing is a skill of mine, I've always had it. in past years, I could go through writing classes on cruise control while everyone else busted their a**es over writing something coherent.
This time, it's not so easy.
The assignment in question is a simple comparison essay, but of al lthe topics to assign, this one has to be the most esoteric and illogical that I have ever written:
"What are the basic differences in the values, beliefs, or backgrounds of the authors that lead to their conflicting perspectives in these articles?" (re: affirmative action, racial profiling, or any other race-related subject). This is asinine b/c the stuff I did find was written from a neutral standpoint and the author did not mention their backgrounds or beliefs. Everything was presented on an as-is basis. F***ing wonderful. I guess I'll have to make s*** up to have something to write about.
The part that really pisses me off is that we are limited to newspaper or magazine articles, no internet. ( The logic being that the CSU (cal state university) campuses do not permit internet sources in student papers, b/c the internet consists mostly of opinion. ) The f***ing morons in charge of uni don't seem to realize that you get opinion in offline sources, too. That's no reason to force us to live in the f***ing stone age. A**holes.
Finding sources for this is a pain in the a**. I've been to magazine stands and combed through countless magazines and found only one article in Newsweek. (which happens to be about a quarter of a page in length) and I need two sources. I have to write 3-5 pages on this and I'll have to add a s***load of filler to meet the quota when all I have is a little block of text.
Do you have any idea how much it pisses me off to be able to google "affirmative action" and get countless articles that have exactly what I need to write this paper? Who appointed these stupid douches at uni to have authority over me when they show their ignorance by pulling s*** like this on students?
So, post the most asinine thing that your school has ever done to you.
My illustrious English 3 teacher assigned an essay assignment. Normally this would not be a problem, as i can pull a fairly decent essay out of my a** (not literally) every time and turn it in without too much hassle. writing is a skill of mine, I've always had it. in past years, I could go through writing classes on cruise control while everyone else busted their a**es over writing something coherent.
This time, it's not so easy.
The assignment in question is a simple comparison essay, but of al lthe topics to assign, this one has to be the most esoteric and illogical that I have ever written:
"What are the basic differences in the values, beliefs, or backgrounds of the authors that lead to their conflicting perspectives in these articles?" (re: affirmative action, racial profiling, or any other race-related subject). This is asinine b/c the stuff I did find was written from a neutral standpoint and the author did not mention their backgrounds or beliefs. Everything was presented on an as-is basis. F***ing wonderful. I guess I'll have to make s*** up to have something to write about.
The part that really pisses me off is that we are limited to newspaper or magazine articles, no internet. ( The logic being that the CSU (cal state university) campuses do not permit internet sources in student papers, b/c the internet consists mostly of opinion. ) The f***ing morons in charge of uni don't seem to realize that you get opinion in offline sources, too. That's no reason to force us to live in the f***ing stone age. A**holes.
Finding sources for this is a pain in the a**. I've been to magazine stands and combed through countless magazines and found only one article in Newsweek. (which happens to be about a quarter of a page in length) and I need two sources. I have to write 3-5 pages on this and I'll have to add a s***load of filler to meet the quota when all I have is a little block of text.
Do you have any idea how much it pisses me off to be able to google "affirmative action" and get countless articles that have exactly what I need to write this paper? Who appointed these stupid douches at uni to have authority over me when they show their ignorance by pulling s*** like this on students?
So, post the most asinine thing that your school has ever done to you.