Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Bill Gates + FORD = cars that can't crash?
Bill Gates + FORD = cars that can't crash?
2005-05-03, 8:40 PM #1
http://www.livescience.com/technology/ap_050502_gates_cars.html

Oh man, I won't even start to go into how badly the /. crowd starting ripping into this idea, but needless to say, it is absolutely ridiculous.

I will, however, share this:

Quote:
Bill Gates wanted to look good and impress everyone with his success. He decided to measure the accomplishments of Microsoft against General Motors. The comparison went like this:

If automotive technology had kept pace with computer technology over the past few decades, you would now be driving a V-32 instead of a V-8, and it would have a top speed of 10,000 miles per hour. (160,000km/hr)

Or you could have an economy car that weighs 30 pounds (14 kilos) and gets a thousand miles to a gallon of gas. In either case the sticker price of a new car would be less than $50.

In response to all this goading, GM issued a press release stating the following: "If GM had developed technology like Microshaft has, we would be driving cars with the following characteristics:"

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash at least twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, your car would die on the freeway for no apparent reason, and you would accept this, restart, and drive on.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to start, in which case you would have to re-install the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought 'Car95' or 'CarNT'. Then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.

7. The oil, water, temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single 'general car fault' warning light.

8. New seats would force everyone to have the same butt size.

9. The airbag system would say "Are you sure?" before going off.

10. Occasioanlly, for no known reason, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither want them or need them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car's performance to diminish by fifty percent or more.

12. Every time GM introduced a new model, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You'd press the 'Start' button to shut off the engine.


Yes, old joke, but so true.
Marsz, marsz, Dąbrowski,
Z ziemi włoskiej do Polski,
Za twoim przewodem
Złączym się z narodem.
2005-05-03, 9:01 PM #2
less than three
2005-05-03, 9:03 PM #3
Quote:
Originally posted by Ric_Olie
6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was more reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five percent of the roads.


Gotta Love Macs...
2005-05-04, 6:16 AM #4
Even if they are a wee bit crappy in some areas.
nope.
2005-05-04, 6:27 AM #5
If that only was real.

Funny however.
Star Wars: TODOA | DXN - Deus Ex: Nihilum
2005-05-04, 7:32 AM #6
If I had a car that got 1000 mpg and weighed 30 pounds, I'd live with the defects. :D
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-05-04, 8:35 AM #7
The day Microsoft software is used to run a PCM is the day I stop driving and start avoiding the roads entirely.
And when the moment is right, I'm gonna fly a kite.
2005-05-04, 11:14 AM #8
Hahah, good stuff. Too bad it wasn't real, Gates woulda been shown up hardcore.
2005-05-04, 11:22 AM #9
Quote:
Originally posted by Ric_Olie
8. New seats would force everyone to have the same butt size.
Gold! :D
Catloaf, meet mouseloaf.
My music
2005-05-04, 11:28 AM #10
haha great stuff.
/fluffle
2005-05-04, 2:36 PM #11
Quote:
Originally posted by Freelancer
If I had a car that got 1000 mpg and weighed 30 pounds, I'd live with the defects. :D
Right. WOuldn't a 30lb car like... not handle worth crap?
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2005-05-04, 2:37 PM #12
Oh, and.. He might wanna try making computers that don't crash first.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2005-05-04, 2:38 PM #13
Hey, why does Windows make such a great prison guard?











































BECAUSE IT ALWAYS LOCKS UP!!!!!
2005-05-04, 2:39 PM #14
OMG ROFL LOLZ GUYZ!!!!1111one
Catloaf, meet mouseloaf.
My music
2005-05-04, 3:21 PM #15
This reminds me how my CompSci teacher keeps exclaiming how neat it will be when cars run on electronic circuity for control instead of mechanical components.

:shudder:
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2005-05-04, 4:42 PM #16
That was funny.
2005-05-04, 10:49 PM #17
Quote:
Originally posted by Sarn_Cadrill
Right. WOuldn't a 30lb car like... not handle worth crap?


Nope. Light weight helps every part of a car's performance.
Little angel go away
Come again some other day
Devil has my ear today
I'll never hear a word you say
2005-05-05, 4:33 AM #18
Quote:
Originally posted by Crimson
Nope. Light weight helps every part of a car's performance.


Except for the being blown over by wind part.
D E A T H
2005-05-05, 4:35 AM #19
And being torn to pieces if you hit a heavier car.
nope.

↑ Up to the top!