Were the atomic bombs in WWII necessary? - Discussion Forum

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

Were the atomic bombs in WWII necessary?

2005-08-05, 11:23 PM #41

Freelancer

Peelancer

Posts: 15,012

Originally posted by Rob:

Killing thousands of innocent people wasn't required.

Innocent pedestrians > Millitary personel

pedestrians??

ROFL.

"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009

2005-08-06, 10:40 AM #42

Temperamental

Sarcastic, too.

Posts: 3,246

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-bird5aug05%2C0%2C760322.story?coll=la-news-comment-opinions#Scene_1

2005-08-06, 10:44 AM #43

Jay

Hey guys, did you hear about Something Awful?

Posts: 8,804

BOMB BOMB BOMB DIE DIE BOOM BOOM EXPLOSION!
>:)

Actually..

Without the bombs, the Allies would have to fight a much longer time to win.

My perspective is...everyone agrees that what has happened, happened. I love history, specifically militarial history, and this is just another peice of dust in the wind. To answer the question, no.