Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → Judge orders 17 year old not to have sex
Judge orders 17 year old not to have sex
2005-10-06, 10:41 AM #1
http://www.wftv.com/irresistible/5040625/detail.html

And she's a republican judge. No shock there.

Whats hilarious is it's Sherman, Texas. Sherman is home to some of the easiest girls in Texas, that girl has probably already broken the law 6 times since the ruling.
I can't think of anything to put here right now.
2005-10-06, 11:01 AM #2
Your sex life isn't any judge's business. period. In the ideal world the ruling wouldn't stand and the 'judge' would lose her job.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-10-06, 11:07 AM #3
Originally posted by Freelancer:
Your sex life isn't any judge's business. period. In the ideal world the ruling wouldn't stand and the 'judge' would lose her job.


ditto.
2005-10-06, 11:09 AM #4
...wow. What a *****.
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2005-10-06, 11:12 AM #5
Wow. That's insane.

What's the legal age of concent over there? Not that it really has any bearing, how are they going enforce it anyway?
TheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWho
SaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTh
eJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSa
ysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJ
kWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSays
NiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkW
2005-10-06, 11:15 AM #6
17 years in Texas is the offical age of consent.

Some argue its also 3 years over. So she can't be with a 21 year old, but she can be with a 16 year old or 20 year old.
I can't think of anything to put here right now.
2005-10-06, 11:43 AM #7
Ahaha.

[FGR comment here]
Star Wars: TODOA | DXN - Deus Ex: Nihilum
2005-10-06, 11:44 AM #8
What the hell, is that even legal?
2005-10-06, 11:54 AM #9
Originally posted by Shintock:
What the hell, is that even legal?


I'm pretty sure it was legal in nazi Germany or Soviet Russia... But anything other than that seems dubious.
Frozen in the past by ICARUS
2005-10-06, 11:56 AM #10
Originally posted by Shintock:
What the hell, is that even legal?


I don't believe it is. The Judge definitely has issues, like the fact that she's probably never gotten any.
"Those ****ing amateurs... You left your dog, you idiots!"
2005-10-06, 12:45 PM #11
I think the judges can inflict unorthodox punishments. For instance, One judge make this little brat take her Mom out to dinner after doing something (I forget what) to her Mom, and bringing it into the court. And I think some hacker got banned from computers.

Anyway, the ruling does make sense. Using some kinds of drugs can give you HIV. She's lucky too, she could have gotten into real trouble.
2005-10-06, 1:00 PM #12
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet:
And I think some hacker got banned from computers.


That's true and it does make sense. It's like banning some murderer from using firearms, which also makes sense.
Frozen in the past by ICARUS
2005-10-06, 1:03 PM #13
The Poll on that site if 50-50 >_<
2005-10-06, 1:07 PM #14
Question. Two people are dating: A 16-year-old and a 17-year-old. They have sex. They each age one year, still dating (now 17 and 18). If they do it again, is it illegal this time?

[http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b259/Matterialize/16.jpg]
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so."
2005-10-06, 2:05 PM #15
I think the general belief that would apply to that is that it's ok for two minors at the age of consent to have sex (though frowned :( upon) but it's not ok for an adult to have sex with a minor, even if he/she is past the age of consent. 18/17 would probably fly in some places, but higher than that probably make no one even consider the age of consent.
"We came, we saw, we conquered, we...woke up!"
2005-10-06, 2:10 PM #16
i hope that judge and all her family die.
2005-10-06, 2:16 PM #17
thats just wrong, like a bunch have people said before me, someones sex life is not the goverments business.
Flipsides crackers are the best crackers to have ever existed
2005-10-06, 2:17 PM #18
yeah, thats why it would kick *** if the judge died, but it would only kick *** if it was slow and painful.
2005-10-06, 2:22 PM #19
What if they are doing it at like 11:59 the midnight before the birthday?
DUn dun dun
2005-10-06, 2:48 PM #20
Originally posted by Arkon11:
thats just wrong, like a bunch have people said before me, someones sex life is not the goverments business.


Hmmm, maybe thoughtcrime isn't so far away as we thought :rolleyes:
"DON'T TASE ME BRO!" lol
2005-10-06, 2:54 PM #21
[quote=The Article]She has also prohibited tattoos, body piercings, earrings and clothing "associated with the drug culture" for those on probation.[/quote]
In otherwords, be a good little Christian girl. Dress only with knee-length dresses, longsleeves and no V-necks.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2005-10-06, 3:32 PM #22
Originally posted by JediGandalf:
In otherwords, be a good little Christian girl. Dress only with knee-length dresses, longsleeves and no V-necks.


You know what they say:

"If you're not in business, don't avertise."
The cake is a lie... THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!!!
2005-10-06, 4:29 PM #23
Just so you know, everyone and his brother sleeping around hurts socity. Kids grow up much better when they have both a mother and a father careing for them until adulthood.
2005-10-06, 4:49 PM #24
I think this is fitting again here.

[http://spamusement.com/gfx/139.gif]
2005-10-06, 6:49 PM #25
Originally posted by Matterialize:
Question. Two people are dating: A 16-year-old and a 17-year-old. They have sex. They each age one year, still dating (now 17 and 18). If they do it again, is it illegal this time?

[http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b259/Matterialize/16.jpg]


No. Age of consent is 17 in Texas. A 17 year old can engage in sexual acts with either an 18 year old or 16 year old. Pretty much when I was 16, I could have had sex with both at once.
I can't think of anything to put here right now.
2005-10-06, 7:14 PM #26
And did!
2005-10-06, 11:19 PM #27
Originally posted by Jedigreedo:
I think the general belief that would apply to that is that it's ok for two minors at the age of consent to have sex (though frowned :( upon) but it's not ok for an adult to have sex with a minor, even if he/she is past the age of consent. 18/17 would probably fly in some places, but higher than that probably make no one even consider the age of consent.


I know that in both Texas (where I reside) and Illinois (where I go to school), there's a three-year difference exception to the age of consent laws.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.
2005-10-06, 11:42 PM #28
Originally posted by Schming:
I don't believe it is. The Judge definitely has issues, like the fact that she's probably never gotten any.


Hahahahaha
2005-10-06, 11:52 PM #29
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet:
Just so you know, everyone and his brother sleeping around hurts socity. Kids grow up much better when they have both a mother and a father careing for them until adulthood.


tfti
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-10-06, 11:56 PM #30
Originally posted by Jedigreedo:
I think the general belief that would apply to that is that it's ok for two minors at the age of consent to have sex (though frowned :( upon) but it's not ok for an adult to have sex with a minor, even if he/she is past the age of consent. 18/17 would probably fly in some places, but higher than that probably make no one even consider the age of consent.


Actually, in most states, it's illegal to have sex as a minor, so therefore they would be breaking the law in the first place.
Completely Overrated Facebook:http://www.facebook.com/pages/Comple...59732330769611
A community dedicated to discussing all things entertainment.
2005-10-07, 12:26 AM #31
While I agree with the judge, I don't think this girl should be having sex (Or using drugs, or whatever), this is no spot for the judicial system to get even close to involved in.
"If you watch television news, you will know less about the world than if you just drink gin straight out of the bottle."
--Garrison Keillor
2005-10-07, 6:42 AM #32
No sex for you! NEXT!
2005-10-07, 10:13 PM #33
Gee, I wonder if this activist judge is going to be taken care of.

Though I suppose it is better than prison.
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2005-10-07, 10:21 PM #34
Holy crap, I took part of the survey and the votes are split right down the middle!
50% think the judge went over the line and 50% think otherwise.
I really wasn't expecting so many to agree with the judges ruling.
You can't judge a book by it's file size

↑ Up to the top!