Originally posted by Freelancer:
That is the primary reason why it's pointless to be religious. Notice that every 'miracle' to ever occur usually happens in writing, long ago, or both. This is simply because as time passes by, it gets easier to imbelish the story.
Probably true, to a good extent.
Quote:
I would also like to point out to the religious folk that faith is detrimental in every situation. The less things you take on faith, the better off you are. It means that when you put your trust in something, it's because you know how it works. Besides, I know very few religious individuals who believe in a random religion because of complete blind faith.
Faith is not detrimental in every situation. Everyone I know who requires evidence and a knowledge of how something works in all situations (which they really don't, do you know how all the components of your car work? How about how that airplane is held together?) freezes up when they come up to something which requires blind faith. Sometimes you don't have time or means to learn all the details about everything and have to fly on faith. Only a balance will really work in reality.
Nobody believes in a random religion because of blind faith. Well, I guess someone could, but, that is not the point. People participate in a religion because it makes sense and sits well to them, but to believe it is the truth requires faith. That's the point, is that there is a final leap of faith.
Quote:
You guys don't believe in your religion because blind faith is a good quality. You believe because your parents trained you to (this is very likely). Another possible reason is that you had some 'spiritual experience.'
I don't believe in my religion. It is usually true though that people believe because their parents raised them that way. I see nothing wrong with that.
Quote:
For some reason, you really want to believe that this 'experience' you had indicates that your religion is true, when it was really either a hallucination or some kind of appeal to emotion. Besides, if blind faith is so important, why would you look for signs such as those to provide evidence that your religion is correct?
You only say 'it was really either a hallucination or some kind of appeal to emotion' because that is what you believe. You have no more proof or evidence of the fallacy of any of this than they do of the truth. You have faith that you are correct, in addition to all of your deduction and observations.
Quote:
I don't understand why the religious twist faith around to make it appear as a good quality. Oh wait. Yes I do. It's because it's easier to keep people under your influence that way.
I don't understand why you twist faith. Oh wait, yes I do, it's because it's easier to feel justified in your belief when you think everyone else is a bunch of loons, instead of simply telling them 'this is what I believe.'
Originally posted by Jon`C:
I have no idea who that is.
So basically, you bash things without understanding them. How scientific of you.
Quote:
Yeah, whatever. 'Excommunication'? Intercourse under duress is still rape buddy.
Excommunication is when a persons name is removed from the church. This is something from many religions.
There was no intercourse under duress.
Quote:
No no no no no. God, you people have no concept of the art. The secret to effectively "bashing" something doesn't involve fact or reason whatsoever. You say what people are already thinking, but in the harshest possible way.
And if I were the least bit interested in learning more about your daffy cult I'd have probably spent some time talking to the last idiot trying to round up door-to-door heaven tickets. Instead of, you know, slamming my door on his foot and threatening to get my gun.
And if I were the least bit interested in learning more about your daffy cult I'd have probably spent some time talking to the last idiot trying to round up door-to-door heaven tickets. Instead of, you know, slamming my door on his foot and threatening to get my gun.
How is this different from Gold, who Jon seems to really hate, anyone? Jon is being willfully ignorant and hostile here. You blow off all of the arguments I have provided and proceed straight to cheap shopts and one liners. Ignorance at it's finest.
Epstein didn't kill himself.