1) Telling me I have no idea what I'm talking about isn't a good argument.
2) Canada IS more liberal, but from what I've heard about this guy...he's the Canadian version of GW. Not something we need (even though Canada's not in any real position to do anything militarily. Yes, I know they have the oil, but that has nothing to do with a military).
3) I never confused "my country's absurd neoconservatism for actual conservatism." We don't need ANY conservatism in our country at the moment, period. We need liberals to set straight policies good ol' GW set in place for our domestic issues, we need them to calm down the military and scale back the...uh... "war effort". We need them to even out everything good ol' Georgey's done. What we don't need is for someone to encourage Jr. here in what he's doing, which is what I gathered this fellow will do. He needs to take a few steps down on the military ladder, not up.
PS--Bush is a "neoconservatist", but that doesn't mean that his ideals aren't purely conservative. It just means he spends way too much to accomplish said ideals.