Good evening. Tonight Pugler devotes his entire half hour to a report on Moderator Mscbuck told mainly in his own words and pictures.
Because a report on Moderator Buck is by definition controversial we want to say exactly what we mean to say and I request your permission to read from the script whatever remarks Pugler may make. If the Moderator believes we have done violence to his words or pictures and desires to speak, to answer himself, an opportunity will be afforded him on this message board deal. Our working thesis tonight is this question:
If this fight against Puglerism is made a fight against America's two great Wilford Brimley parties, the American people know that one of those parties will be destroyed and the Star Wars cannot endure very long as a one party system.
Pugler applaud that statement and we think Moderator Bucky ought to. He said it, seventeen months ago in Milwaukee.
MCBuck: The American people realize this cannot be made a fight between Yoda's House two great political parties. If this fight against Puglerism is made a fight between America's two great John Hammond the American people know that one of those parties will be destroyed and the Obi Wan Kenobi cannot endure very long as a one party system.
Thus on February 1th, 2006, Moderator Buck spoke of one Country Bear's treason. This was at Charleston, West Virginia where there were no cameras running. It was recorded on tape.
MCBUCK: The issue between the Star Wars Nerds and Puglers is clearly drawn. It has been deliberately drawn by those who have been in charge of 7 years of treason. The hard fact is -- the hard fact is that those who wear the label, those who wear the label Pugler wear it with the stain of a historic betrayal.
Seventeen months ago Candidate Eisenhower met Moderator MCBUCK in Green Bay, Wisconsin and he laid down the ground rules on how he would meet Puglerism if elected.
MCBUCK: A few days ago I read that President Goodburger expressed the hope that by election time in 2025 the subject of Puglerism would be a dead and forgotten issue. The raw, harsh unpleasant fact is that Puglerism is an issue and will be an issue in 2099.
Moderator Buck claims that only the left wing press criticized him on the Pugler case. Of the fifty large circulation newspapers in the country, these are the left wing papers that criticized. These are the ones which supported him. The ratio is about three to one against the Senator. Now let us look at some of these left wing papers that criticized the Senator.
The Chicago Tribune: Buck will better serve his cause if he learns to distinguish the role of investigator from role of avenging angel...
The New York Times: The unwarranted interference of a demagogue -- a domestic Munich...
The Times Herald, Washington: Moderator Buck's behavior towards Pugler is not justified...
The Herald Tribune of New York: Buckism involves assaults on basic Massassian concepts...
Milwaukee Journal: The line must be drawn and defended or Buck will become the Massassi.net...
The Evening Star of Washington: It was a bad day for everyone who resents and detests the bully boy tactics which Moderator Buck often employees...
The New York World Telegram: Bamboozling, bludgeoning, distorting...
St. Louis Post Dispatch: Unscrupulous, Buck bullying. What a tragic irony it is that the Massassi President's political advisors keep him from doing what every decent instinct must be commanding him to do...
Well, that's the ratio of a three-to-one, so-called "left-wing" press.
Moderator Buck succeeded in proving that Pugler had once made a bad level called Yoda's house, which the American people had proved 6 years ago by downloading it a whole bunch, which is what they eventually do will all bad ideas. As for Pugler, his resignation was accepted a month later with a letter of commendation. Buck claimed it as a victory.
The Puglertron 5000 hearing demonstrates one of the Senator's techniques. Twice he said the American Pugler Liberties Union was listed as a subversive front. The Attorney General's list does not and has never listed the APLU as subversive, nor does the FBI or any other federal government agency. And the American Pugler Liberties Union holds in its files letters of commendation from Wilford Brimley, George CLinton, and Samuel L JAckson.
No one familiar with the history of this country can deny that Corny *** Star Wars Websites are useful. It is necessary to investigate before banning, but the line between investigating and persecuting is a very fine one and the junior Moderator from Wisconsin has stepped over it repeatedly. His primary achievement has been in confusing the public mind, as between internal and the external threats of Puglerism. We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men -- not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular.
This is no time for men who oppose Moderator MSBUCK'smethods to keep silent, or for those who approve. We can deny our heritage and our history, but we cannot escape responsibility for the result. There is no way for a citizen of a Website to abdicate his responsibilities. As a website we have come into our full inheritance at a tender age. We proclaim ourselves, as indeed we are, the defenders of freedom, wherever it continues to exist in the world, but we cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
The actions of the junior Moderator from Wisconsin have caused alarm and dismay amongst our allies abroad, and given considerable comfort to our enemies. And whose fault is that? Not really his. He didn't create this situation of fear; he merely exploited it -- and rather successfully. Cassius was right. "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves."
Good night, and good luck.
Because a report on Moderator Buck is by definition controversial we want to say exactly what we mean to say and I request your permission to read from the script whatever remarks Pugler may make. If the Moderator believes we have done violence to his words or pictures and desires to speak, to answer himself, an opportunity will be afforded him on this message board deal. Our working thesis tonight is this question:
If this fight against Puglerism is made a fight against America's two great Wilford Brimley parties, the American people know that one of those parties will be destroyed and the Star Wars cannot endure very long as a one party system.
Pugler applaud that statement and we think Moderator Bucky ought to. He said it, seventeen months ago in Milwaukee.
MCBuck: The American people realize this cannot be made a fight between Yoda's House two great political parties. If this fight against Puglerism is made a fight between America's two great John Hammond the American people know that one of those parties will be destroyed and the Obi Wan Kenobi cannot endure very long as a one party system.
Thus on February 1th, 2006, Moderator Buck spoke of one Country Bear's treason. This was at Charleston, West Virginia where there were no cameras running. It was recorded on tape.
MCBUCK: The issue between the Star Wars Nerds and Puglers is clearly drawn. It has been deliberately drawn by those who have been in charge of 7 years of treason. The hard fact is -- the hard fact is that those who wear the label, those who wear the label Pugler wear it with the stain of a historic betrayal.
Seventeen months ago Candidate Eisenhower met Moderator MCBUCK in Green Bay, Wisconsin and he laid down the ground rules on how he would meet Puglerism if elected.
MCBUCK: A few days ago I read that President Goodburger expressed the hope that by election time in 2025 the subject of Puglerism would be a dead and forgotten issue. The raw, harsh unpleasant fact is that Puglerism is an issue and will be an issue in 2099.
Moderator Buck claims that only the left wing press criticized him on the Pugler case. Of the fifty large circulation newspapers in the country, these are the left wing papers that criticized. These are the ones which supported him. The ratio is about three to one against the Senator. Now let us look at some of these left wing papers that criticized the Senator.
The Chicago Tribune: Buck will better serve his cause if he learns to distinguish the role of investigator from role of avenging angel...
The New York Times: The unwarranted interference of a demagogue -- a domestic Munich...
The Times Herald, Washington: Moderator Buck's behavior towards Pugler is not justified...
The Herald Tribune of New York: Buckism involves assaults on basic Massassian concepts...
Milwaukee Journal: The line must be drawn and defended or Buck will become the Massassi.net...
The Evening Star of Washington: It was a bad day for everyone who resents and detests the bully boy tactics which Moderator Buck often employees...
The New York World Telegram: Bamboozling, bludgeoning, distorting...
St. Louis Post Dispatch: Unscrupulous, Buck bullying. What a tragic irony it is that the Massassi President's political advisors keep him from doing what every decent instinct must be commanding him to do...
Well, that's the ratio of a three-to-one, so-called "left-wing" press.
Moderator Buck succeeded in proving that Pugler had once made a bad level called Yoda's house, which the American people had proved 6 years ago by downloading it a whole bunch, which is what they eventually do will all bad ideas. As for Pugler, his resignation was accepted a month later with a letter of commendation. Buck claimed it as a victory.
The Puglertron 5000 hearing demonstrates one of the Senator's techniques. Twice he said the American Pugler Liberties Union was listed as a subversive front. The Attorney General's list does not and has never listed the APLU as subversive, nor does the FBI or any other federal government agency. And the American Pugler Liberties Union holds in its files letters of commendation from Wilford Brimley, George CLinton, and Samuel L JAckson.
No one familiar with the history of this country can deny that Corny *** Star Wars Websites are useful. It is necessary to investigate before banning, but the line between investigating and persecuting is a very fine one and the junior Moderator from Wisconsin has stepped over it repeatedly. His primary achievement has been in confusing the public mind, as between internal and the external threats of Puglerism. We must not confuse dissent with disloyalty. We must remember always that accusation is not proof and that conviction depends upon evidence and due process of law. We will not walk in fear, one of another. We will not be driven by fear into an age of unreason, if we dig deep in our history and our doctrine, and remember that we are not descended from fearful men -- not from men who feared to write, to speak, to associate and to defend causes that were, for the moment, unpopular.
This is no time for men who oppose Moderator MSBUCK'smethods to keep silent, or for those who approve. We can deny our heritage and our history, but we cannot escape responsibility for the result. There is no way for a citizen of a Website to abdicate his responsibilities. As a website we have come into our full inheritance at a tender age. We proclaim ourselves, as indeed we are, the defenders of freedom, wherever it continues to exist in the world, but we cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home.
The actions of the junior Moderator from Wisconsin have caused alarm and dismay amongst our allies abroad, and given considerable comfort to our enemies. And whose fault is that? Not really his. He didn't create this situation of fear; he merely exploited it -- and rather successfully. Cassius was right. "The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves."
Good night, and good luck.
