Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Extended/Special/Unrated DVDs
Extended/Special/Unrated DVDs
2006-02-14, 3:43 PM #1
Anyone know of any sites that specialize in announcing upcoming DVD special editions? I'm trying to make sure I don't reexperience something similar to buying Fellowship of the Ring only to see included on the disc the fact that there was a forthcoming extended edition. Needless to say I skipped the initial DVD release of TTT and RotK.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2006-02-14, 8:27 PM #2
[url]www.thedigitalbits.com[/url] is what I use for DVD rumors.
twitter | flickr | last.fm | facebook |
2006-02-14, 9:06 PM #3
DVD special editions suck for the most part. Movie companies now have figured out that they can make extra money by releasing special editions after everyone has already bought the regular edition. They add stupid stuff, like 5-10 minutes of pointless extra footage that was cut for a reason, and have commentary by some guy who did props work for like 2 days for the movie.

Occaisionally, though, special editions are awesome.
2006-02-14, 9:14 PM #4
The suckage of a special addition is directly related to how much more it costs than the regular version.
Pissed Off?
2006-02-14, 9:16 PM #5
Originally posted by Avenger:
The suckage of a special addition is directly related to how much more it costs than the regular version.


With the exception of the Extended Edition LotR movies.
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2006-02-14, 9:19 PM #6
What annoys me are those "Unrated versions" of movies. Because DVDs contain content and footage that haven't been reviewed by the rating board, certain movies just slap that label on. Of course, some "unrated versions" attract buyers because of a short segment of "frontal nudity."
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2006-02-15, 1:54 AM #7
Originally posted by Echoman:
What annoys me are those "Unrated versions" of movies. Because DVDs contain content and footage that haven't been reviewed by the rating board, certain movies just slap that label on. Of course, some "unrated versions" attract buyers because of a short segment of "frontal nudity."


With the exception of the Extended Edition LotR movies.
Frozen in the past by ICARUS
2006-02-15, 6:20 AM #8
hehehehehe
Pissed Off?
2006-02-15, 7:34 AM #9
Originally posted by Avenger:
hehehehehe


With the exception of the Extended Edition LotR movies.
2006-02-15, 7:52 AM #10
Originally posted by Hebedee:
With the exception of the Extended Edition LotR movies.


With the exception of the Extended Edition LotR movies.

*nods* I see how this works.
Was cheated out of lions by happydud
Was cheated out of marriage by sugarless
2006-02-15, 8:13 AM #11
I don't understand :confused: . Well, with the exception of the Extended Edition LoTR movies, of course.
Stuff
2006-02-15, 2:44 PM #12
I got to thinking that with what Jackson did with the LotR movies he might do something similar with King Kong although I don't think King Kong needs that treatment. Thanks for the link TimeWolf!
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2006-02-15, 3:03 PM #13
Originally posted by Echoman:
What annoys me are those "Unrated versions" of movies. Because DVDs contain content and footage that haven't been reviewed by the rating board, certain movies just slap that label on. Of course, some "unrated versions" attract buyers because of a short segment of "frontal nudity."
If a film company makes any editing changes to a film it needs to be re-rated. This takes time and costs, I think, $6000. Usually it's not worthwhile.

Film companies have turned their greed into a selling point. You'll generally only find it in the low-brow sort of movie, where they try to advertise "unrated" as some kind of borderline pornography.
2006-02-15, 4:37 PM #14
The rating is sometimes troublesome, because companies try to artificially make the movies pass lower rating limits. Of course they can complain about the board decisions, and those complaints often are noted favorably. But also they cut away good if not essential parts just to get a lower rating. And then those cut movies go on DVD. The Director's Cut is the proper version to get if such a thing happens.

Also in the case of the LOTR movies, even if the sheer lenght was the biggest issue of those movies.
Frozen in the past by ICARUS

↑ Up to the top!