Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Viruses, Living or Non-Living?
12
Viruses, Living or Non-Living?
2006-03-09, 5:02 PM #1
I say non-living.
2006-03-09, 5:03 PM #2
Review the characteristics of living organisms.
2006-03-09, 5:05 PM #3
I say non-living, and SCIENCE! backs me up.

Fire, on the other hand, has all the characteristics of a living organism.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.
2006-03-09, 5:12 PM #4
Define "living" and I can conclusively prove if it's living or not.
2006-03-09, 5:13 PM #5
I have no idea what this is even about, so I voted bible thumper.
If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.

Lassev: I guess there was something captivating in savagery, because I liked it.
2006-03-09, 5:17 PM #6
I even researched it for those who don't know:

Quote:
Viruses are non-living particles that can only replicate when an organism reproduces the virulent RNA or DNA.


Wikilink

(To a biologist that anaylizes living things, here is the characteristics of life)
2006-03-09, 5:17 PM #7
It's been scientifically proven that viruses are non-living.

I learned that last month in Bio
"Oh my god. That just made me want to start cutting" - Aglar
"Why do people from ALL OVER NORTH AMERICA keep asking about CATS?" - Steven, 4/1/2009
2006-03-09, 5:20 PM #8
[QUOTE=Michael MacFarlane]

Fire, on the other hand, has all the characteristics of a living organism.[/QUOTE]

It has cells? :rolleyes:
"DON'T TASE ME BRO!" lol
2006-03-09, 6:08 PM #9
Originally posted by petmc20:
It's been scientifically proven that viruses are non-living.

I learned that last month in Bio

It's still a huge debate whether viruses are living or non-living though.

I believe they're non-living because they cannot reproduce on their own.
2006-03-09, 6:10 PM #10
And they don't use energy...
omnia mea mecum porto
2006-03-09, 6:31 PM #11
erm, they're organic.

therefore living.
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2006-03-09, 6:35 PM #12
Originally posted by Ruthven:
erm, they're organic.


So is plastic. And oil. And vinegar.
2006-03-09, 6:37 PM #13
...Ruth, no. Organic can just mean a compound based on carbon. Not all organic things are living.
omnia mea mecum porto
2006-03-09, 6:37 PM #14
Originally posted by Shintock:
So is plastic.


So is Michael Jackson....
"DON'T TASE ME BRO!" lol
2006-03-09, 6:45 PM #15
by organic I mean it has the abilty to act of its own accord, move, eat, fart, etc.
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2006-03-09, 6:47 PM #16
Originally posted by Ruthven:
by organic I mean it has the abilty to act of its own accord, move, eat, fart, etc.


AIDS can't fart buddy :p
"Oh my god. That just made me want to start cutting" - Aglar
"Why do people from ALL OVER NORTH AMERICA keep asking about CATS?" - Steven, 4/1/2009
2006-03-09, 6:49 PM #17
Originally posted by Ruthven:
by organic I mean it has the abilty to act of its own accord, move, eat, fart, etc.

No, no they can't.
omnia mea mecum porto
2006-03-09, 6:50 PM #18
a shame, it would be much funnier to live with.
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2006-03-09, 6:51 PM #19
ok fine, screw it, I'm a physicist, not a biology hoe.
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2006-03-09, 6:53 PM #20
Humans are pretty wack at classifying and creating categories, so I picked Bible thumper.
"The only crime I'm guilty of is love [of china]"
- Ruthven
me clan me mod
2006-03-09, 7:35 PM #21
Viruses are not made of cells, they do not grow, they cannot reproduce on their own, and they can be crystallized safely -- a process that kills living organisms. Therefore, viruses are not alive.
"It is not advisable, James, to venture unsolicited opinions. You should spare yourself the embarrassing discovery of their exact value to your listener."
"Rationality is the recognition of the fact that nothing can alter the truth and nothing can take precedence over that act of perceiving it."
2006-03-09, 7:37 PM #22
well i never.

You learn something new everyday
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2006-03-09, 7:43 PM #23
Well, why do viruses exist? Did they evolve?
SnailIracing:n(500tpostshpereline)pants
-----------------------------@%
2006-03-09, 7:45 PM #24
but viruses can mutate ( did i spell that right ?), so they can do something.
Matt
2006-03-09, 7:47 PM #25
viruses can KILL!

Can something non-living kill?

hmm?

yeh, probably
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2006-03-09, 7:47 PM #26
Viruses are cool. But no, they aren't living, in the traditional definition anyways.

A better discussion would be "Pluto: Planet or KBO?"
Stuff
2006-03-09, 7:54 PM #27
Originally posted by kyle90:
Viruses are cool. But no, they aren't living, in the traditional definition anyways.

A better discussion would be "Pluto: Planet or KBO?"

Make your own poll **********.
2006-03-09, 8:22 PM #28
Originally posted by Avp2MattJa:
but viruses can mutate ( did i spell that right ?), so they can do something.

Mostly because of how weak DNA and RNA is. Think of the old punch cards used to program computers, make a few thousand copies and see how many are different from the original.
omnia mea mecum porto
2006-03-09, 8:25 PM #29
Originally posted by tofu:
Make your own poll **********.


Okay.
Stuff
2006-03-09, 8:41 PM #30
I'm living.
On a Swedish chainsaw: "Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals."
2006-03-09, 8:49 PM #31
Since when could computer code be considered alive? :p
011011110110110101100111
2006-03-09, 8:51 PM #32
Since the Matrix sequels came out, probably.
Stuff
2006-03-09, 10:23 PM #33
[QUOTE=Michael MacFarlane]Fire, on the other hand, has all the characteristics of a living organism.[/QUOTE]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dissipative_system
Also, I can kill you with my brain.
2006-03-09, 10:44 PM #34
Viruses are like little nanobots programmed to wage biological warfare.

Maybe aliens unleashed them on us.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2006-03-09, 10:52 PM #35
Originally posted by Freelancer:
Maybe aliens unleashed them on us.

You may actually by right. It's just as probable that alien life is more like viruses than it is like the rest of life on earth. I think viruses show that there's not only one type of possible living creature.

I vote yes, because I disagree with the current definition of life. Viruses are evolving, reproducing entities. Just because they aren't built the same way as other earth life doesn't mean they're not alive.
2006-03-09, 11:06 PM #36
Viruses are not living, but they are not completely non-living, either.

I feel that the fact that they are self replicating with the assistance of a host (as opposed to something like a chair or table lamp which obviously is not self replicating and not alive) means that they are alive to some extent.
2006-03-09, 11:08 PM #37
I find it interesting there are so many living votes.
2006-03-09, 11:43 PM #38
I'm pretty sure the question is intended, and would be better phrased, as:

Should the definition of life be changed to include viruses?

I think, probably yes. I agree with pagewizard.
Warhead[97]
2006-03-09, 11:54 PM #39
So would we then classify nanomachines and new self-replicating robots as living?
omnia mea mecum porto
2006-03-10, 12:00 AM #40
Not if we have dna/rna as a requirement too.
12

↑ Up to the top!