..or is just another totally unsound conspiracy theory?
I've often wondered why p2p software and malware are so often synonomous with one another. Think about it: Most p2p programs (including the ever-lovable kazaa) come bundled with spyware that is often a mandatory install-- in some cases, removing the spyware cripples the program.
I've come to suspect that a lot of p2p is merely intended to be a spyware delivery system and that is its real purpose all along.
By dangling a carrot of free [usually illicit] content in front of users, people get greedy enough to download the p2p software and have their online activities sent back to base for marketing analysis.
I don't completely buy the this "software-is-ad-supported" explanation, either. Installing intrusive and often annoying ad software is not necessary when a more passive constantly-changing ad banner would get the job done.
What do you think?
I've often wondered why p2p software and malware are so often synonomous with one another. Think about it: Most p2p programs (including the ever-lovable kazaa) come bundled with spyware that is often a mandatory install-- in some cases, removing the spyware cripples the program.
I've come to suspect that a lot of p2p is merely intended to be a spyware delivery system and that is its real purpose all along.
By dangling a carrot of free [usually illicit] content in front of users, people get greedy enough to download the p2p software and have their online activities sent back to base for marketing analysis.
I don't completely buy the this "software-is-ad-supported" explanation, either. Installing intrusive and often annoying ad software is not necessary when a more passive constantly-changing ad banner would get the job done.
What do you think?