Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → I'm the statistics cheater! (Or something like that.)
I'm the statistics cheater! (Or something like that.)
2004-06-29, 3:44 PM #1
Go to check my mail this morning, and noticed some non-spam in my Hotmail account(used it for a "junk" account for a while, as well as a few things it's tied to). Apparently it's a message from someone who works on ticalc.org. Well, the email contained this:

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Your file will be removed from the list of files that accumulate stats
for cheating stats. Please do not do this anymore.</font>


I found that kind of funny. This was referring to the only program I ever submitted there, which was over like a year and a half ago. Normally I would've ignored it, since really, some crappy program I wrote a year and a half ago isn't important to me. Only accumulated like 1000 downloads in a year and a half, nothing big. The manner in which the guy blindly assumed I was the cause of this "stat cheating" kind of annoyed me though. So, I decided to write him a nice letter in response...

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Thank you for the blind accusation. Unfortunately, it is a false
accusation. I assume you based this on some log that showed an IP address
downloading the same file multiple times. If this is the case, what made
you arrive to the conclusion that I would be the one doing it? That program
was submitted over a year and a half ago. Why would I have waited over a
year and a half to skew statistics as you accuse me of doing? Sorry, but
no, I'm not some social outcast who relies on numbers on a web site to make
themselves feel good. It is quite insulting for you to assume that. Here
is some advice for you. Next time you feel the need to accuse someone of
something, do it in a more professional manner. Maybe some actual evidence
that supports your claims would help next time. Maybe it's time for you to
revise your download tracking software if it allows such easy cheating.</font>


Unfortunately the guy hasn't responded to that, heh. I hope he does though. I want to see his reasoning, heh.

[This message has been edited by Darth (edited June 29, 2004).]
2004-06-29, 3:57 PM #2
you zinged him good.

------------------
Those silly bullets have minds of their own!
Jon`C:Irony is spelling 'quality' poorly.
Spork:Well I think 'Irony is spelling grammar poorly'
Snail racing: (500 posts per line)-@%
Snail racing: (500 posts per line)------@%
2004-06-29, 5:10 PM #3
It was probably an automated message, don't you think?

------------------
"May your gravity well be shallow, and your deBroglie wavelength short."
Stuff
2004-06-29, 5:19 PM #4
Quite possible. Frankly, I don't know why their download counter wouldn't check for same ip downloads, and null all downloads beyond 1.

------------------
"The future is not determined by a throw of the dice, but is determined by the conscious decisions of you and me."
I am addicted to ellipses!!! AHHH!!! ...
Make Sorrowind Worthwhile... join it! http://sorrowind.net
2004-06-29, 5:35 PM #5
yeah but it wouldn't work with dial-up people with lots of free time and money to burn on loging on and off multiple times.

------------------
Those silly bullets have minds of their own!
Jon`C:Irony is spelling 'quality' poorly.
Spork:Well I think 'Irony is spelling grammar poorly'
Snail racing: (500 posts per line)-@%
Snail racing: (500 posts per line)------@%
2004-06-29, 5:41 PM #6
They wouldn't make an automated message for something as obscure as skewing download statistics.

↑ Up to the top!