Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Good FREE Writing Software
Good FREE Writing Software
2004-07-08, 11:03 AM #1
I need a good writing program and I need it REALLY REALLY fast. Wordpad isnt cutting it I have a paper due tomorrow so please help me out!!
Oberfeldwebel says: ..... You are the epitome of idiocy.
2004-07-08, 11:06 AM #2
Notepad.
2004-07-08, 11:11 AM #3
OpenOffice

------------------
When guitars are outlawed, only outlaws will have guitars.
2004-07-08, 11:16 AM #4
Abiword.

It's good, it's free, it's fun. OpenOffice is good and all, but it's the lags. Java doesn't work well on windows.

------------------
There is no signature
D E A T H
2004-07-08, 11:52 AM #5
Java doesn't work well anywhere [http://forums.massassi.net/html/wink.gif]

Abiword is fine, a lot better than wordpad. OpenOffice is great, just slow. Definitely go with abiword, it's a much smaller download as well [http://forums.massassi.net/html/wink.gif]

------------------
EvilMagic.net: Brian's Web Log
2004-07-08, 12:56 PM #6
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by MaD CoW:
OpenOffice

</font>


I've used OpenOffice for a while now, and I like it a lot. However, sometimes I feel that it takes an unnecessarily long time to load up compared to Word.

------------------
GhostOfYoda - General doer of stuff.
Massassi's Official Chatroom: irc.synirc.com #massassi
2004-07-08, 2:48 PM #7
I've never had problems with openoffice, in either linux or windows. It takes a few seconds longer than word to open, and some would call that lag, but seriously, what were you planning on doing with those few extra seconds? [http://forums.massassi.net/html/tongue.gif]




------------------
The University of North Carolina has finally found a network server that, although missing for four years, hasn't missed a packet in all that time. Try as they might, university administrators couldn't find the server. Working with Novell Inc., IT workers tracked it down by meticulously following cable until they literally ran into a wall. The server had been mistakenly sealed behind drywall by maintenance workers.
2004-07-08, 2:51 PM #8
I too recommend OpenOrifice.

------------------
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2004-07-08, 2:58 PM #9
Why don't you like Java Brian?

------------------
Pissed off?
2004-07-08, 3:03 PM #10
It's slow, under the Sun platform it's buggy, and it's just downright well...crappy anymore. It's gone downhill ever since Sun took over.

------------------
There is no signature
D E A T H
2004-07-08, 3:21 PM #11
You can get StarOffice (a better version of OO) for free if you're a student. You can get it from Sun's website.

------------------
"Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition."
That painting was a gift, Todd. I'm taking it with me.
2004-07-08, 3:28 PM #12
I've never used a GUI java program that performed decently enough to be usable. Everything from menu speeds to text entry speeds is simply abysmal. Even with a very simple text editor *I* wrote in Java, I can type faster than the letters appear on the screen. In both windows and linux. I guess java is okay for applets like the chat crapplet, but for some reason, full-fledged gui programs tend to bite.

As for programming in java, I hate it because of the entirely too long, unclear, and annoying object heirarchy. For example:

Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">public void onMessage(String channel, String sender,
String login, String hostname, String message) {
if (message.equalsIgnoreCase("time")) {
String time = new java.util.Date().toString();
sendMessage(channel, sender + ": The time is now " + time);
}
}</font>


There are so many things wrong with this code it's not even funny. First, you have to declare variable types too many times. For example, String myString = new String; Duh.

Second, they are using object methods to test equality, instead of simple operators like "==" or "eq":

if (message.equalsIgnoreCase("time")) {

Third, the object heirarchy is a nightmare:

String time = new java.util.Date().toString();

So, it takes that much to get a TIMESTAMP. I have to browse through the base java class, to the util class, where I finally find a date method, which of course returns a date object, so I have to then convert the date object to a string. That's four levels of objects/methods just to get a stinking timestamp. And that's one of the LEAST extreme examples I could find.

The language just isn't friendly to programmers. Maybe it's more "proper" and maybe it's more "structured," but it sure is a pain in the *** to code in.

------------------
EvilMagic.net: Brian's Web Log
2004-07-08, 3:29 PM #13
$message =~ s/heirarchy/hierarchy/gi;

------------------
EvilMagic.net: Brian's Web Log
2004-07-08, 9:16 PM #14
I agree with the last two posts. Java has some nice things, but so much is ridiculously stupid...

------------------
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.

↑ Up to the top!