http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=oddlyEnoughNews&storyid=2006-12-12T154047Z_01_N11175774_RTRUKOC_0_US-BLIND-HUNTERS.xml

And finally, a balance is restored.

I was just reading this on /.

I have no strong feelings one way or the other.

Um, not sure what fun it is to hunt when you can't see, but whatever.

Eh... I don't know? What about liability?

"He'z doin all the shootin, I'z just tell'n em when he done had a person in his sights! Crazy som***** killed a whole slew a black folks! I'z figer'n that blind folks aught to be able to be a racist and murderin folks too. I'z just doin my duty as his seein' partnr!"

[insert blind pun]

Well, they already let Dick Cheney hunt.

Eh, it's still safer than hunting with Dick Cheney.

Well if one assumes that a bullet travels at the speed of sound, this is no different than an un-blind person hunting with a laser gun.

And since that would be awesome, I'm totally in favour of letting blind people hunt.

Well, for one, a .30-06 fires a round a 2.6 times the speed of sound. But, I'm failing to see how the to a blind person would equal a laser to a seeing person, since a seeing person can see what they're shooting...

Yay! I can shoot people and claim I was blind. Goodbye 95% of population of which are stupid.

Hunting like that doesn't sound like fun for either the blind person or the guy aiming =/