Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → Jack McClellan
Jack McClellan
2007-09-03, 4:32 PM #1
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/27/us/27pedophile.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

I don't know how many of you have been following this story, but it seems to have come to an end for the time being. It could have turned out worse for this guy, but it's still worrying that an entire state could put so much effort into going after a man who has broken no laws, no matter what he says he is. Regardless of pedophilia, he seems to be a rather odd person, which may have hurt his case.
Attachment: 17241/Jack_McClellan.jpg (26,143 bytes)
Why do the heathens rage behind the firehouse?
2007-09-03, 4:45 PM #2
Don't worry, Jack, we won't judge you as harshly as California did.
2007-09-03, 5:08 PM #3
...it's worrying that a pro-pedophile activist was looked down upon by a state?
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-09-03, 5:11 PM #4
Hmm. I'd hoped I hadn't veiled that jab at CarpKing too thickly. Nevermind :P
2007-09-03, 5:15 PM #5
I was commenting at what TheCarpKing said...
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-09-03, 5:18 PM #6
Huh. Disregard my previous comment, then :ninja:
2007-09-03, 5:40 PM #7
Carpking would make a thread like this.
2007-09-03, 6:33 PM #8
Originally posted by TheCarpKing:
Regardless of pedophilia, he seems to be a rather odd person, which may have hurt his case.


That may be the most ****ed up and nonsensical sentence I've ever read.
<spe> maevie - proving dykes can't fly

<Dor> You're levelling up and gaining more polys!
2007-09-03, 6:35 PM #9
Do ya have a link that doesn't require loging in?
Or care to sumerize for those who have no idea who that is?
On a Swedish chainsaw: "Do not attempt to stop chain with your hands or genitals."
2007-09-03, 6:44 PM #10
Long story short: he's a dirty dirty man that scouted venues/playgrounds/schoolyards that had high little-girl populations, took pictures at said places, and then established not one, but two "how-to" websites dealing with how to scout similar sites and how to approach little girls there.
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-09-03, 7:32 PM #11
I didn't have to log in for that article, but Wikipedia has a pretty good play-by-play of the restraining order business: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_McClellan

He used to live in Washington (where he operated the web sites in question) but he left due to the "media hysteria," which then followed him: http://www.komotv.com/news/7987267.html

He's a creepy guy, but you can't outlaw creepiness.
Why do the heathens rage behind the firehouse?
2007-09-03, 7:39 PM #12
You can outlaw pedophilia though. That goes a little beyond "creepiness."
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-09-03, 7:50 PM #13
Originally posted by Roach:
You can outlaw pedophilia though. That goes a little beyond "creepiness."


Can you? I always thought that laws generally governed actions. Pedophilia is a sexual preference.
Why do the heathens rage behind the firehouse?
2007-09-03, 7:59 PM #14
Uh huh, establishing websites to help other "creepy" men go and take photos of little girls for their own personal spank-bank is an action. Taking photos of little girls for masturbatory purposes is an action. Stalking little girls is an action.
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-09-03, 8:27 PM #15
Originally posted by Roach:
Uh huh, establishing websites to help other "creepy" men go and take photos of little girls for their own personal spank-bank is an action. Taking photos of little girls for masturbatory purposes is an action. Stalking little girls is an action.


But none of those actions is illegal, it's just creepy.

I'm not defending the guy, if I saw him myself I'd kick his balls north of his liver, but from a purely legal sense, he's done nothing wrong.
"If you watch television news, you will know less about the world than if you just drink gin straight out of the bottle."
--Garrison Keillor
2007-09-03, 8:35 PM #16
Stalking is illegal, especially if those girls' parents discovered why that man is taking pictures of them.
omnia mea mecum porto
2007-09-03, 8:40 PM #17
Originally posted by TheCarpKing:
Can you? I always thought that laws generally governed actions. Pedophilia is a sexual preference.


Please tell me that you ARE not defending Pedophiles, and their actions that have MESSED up the lives of who knows how many victims.
Nothing to see here, move along.
2007-09-03, 8:44 PM #18
I actually agree with Gold.


I don't expect much from Carpking.

He's a lolicon addict, and probably has a very under age "girlfriend" from the way he talks about her.
2007-09-03, 9:16 PM #19
Little girls are overrated.

i would know

o.0
2007-09-03, 10:32 PM #20
Originally posted by TheCarpKing:
Can you? I always thought that laws generally governed actions. Pedophilia is a sexual preference.




A sexual preference usually forced upon those who can't, in most cases, consent to the sexual action.
If my smoking bothers you, don't breathe.
2007-09-03, 11:26 PM #21
I highly doubt a majority of people who are sexually attracted to children have molested a child. Sources now or concede.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2007-09-03, 11:42 PM #22
Damn you Americans are nuts.
Star Wars: TODOA | DXN - Deus Ex: Nihilum
2007-09-03, 11:49 PM #23
This thread can't go anywhere good.
-=I'm the wang of this here site, and it's HUGE! So just imagine how big I am.=-
1337Yectiwan
The OSC Empire
10 of 14 -- 27 Lives On

↑ Up to the top!