OH MY GOD DEADMAN IS MAKING A CHUCK NORRIS THREAD WHAT THE HELL!?!?!
Yes, that's right, long term hater of Chuck (I merely disliked him before the jokes, by the way) is actually making a thread about him.
And not just him, but the very jokes which fuel my hatred, and are a perfect example of the mindless idiocy of the internet (sorry if this annoys... well, not really)

So what on earth am I doing making a thread about them?
What in fact, is the point of this thread anyway?

All the answers and more, are right here:

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=339704

Former Chuck lover here. Chuck's concerns are legitimate - me and many people that I know once DID believe that Chuck's tears cure cancer, but we recently discovered that in fact every teardrop that hits the ground kills one puppy. Also, Chuck Norris doesn't sleep, he FAILS.

Right.

I hate Chuck Norris. I think he's extremely stupid for suing over these facts... without them no one would give a **** about them.

Vin Diesel for ever.

I completely agree Vin.
The one thing that has resurrected him from media death and he sues.
Idiot.

Actually, I thought it started when Conan O'Brien introduced the Chuck Norris Lever on his show and it always showed some ridiculous clip from Texas Ranger. Not long after these facts started appearing and I kind of think people still realized they were poking fun at Chuck Norris. Then they started taking it seriously! Oh well.

No. All those facts were about Vin Diesel first. And Bob Saget.

I think it all started with an SNL sketch, but I'm not sure.

And to think he could have lived forever as a perpetual internet fad....

Wait! There's still hope....

My scientist friend just told me they've discovered that AIDS originated from when Chuck Norris raped a male rhesus monkey. Strange but true!

The monkey died of a brain aneurysm.

I think that's the point. They've become one of his greatest assets. I mean, I don't know that anyone cares to see him in a movie.

The only reason I think he sued was because they may have not gone to Chuck himself and ask if they could do all the jokes, and since alot of them in the book may go against his faith he sues. He's supported this movement for him for the whole time, he might just see them as making money off a series of free jokes.

The article fails to mention how psychotically religious and hate mongering chuck is.

Some of them are kinda offensive, so I can see how Chuck would have a problem with his name being linked to those jokes.