Which city do you like the best? (the city design, not the game itself)
I was playing the liberty city mod for GTA:VC (which is basically a port of the GTA3 map to the much-improved VC engine. There are no missions, but you can wander around the map and steal cars, and thats about it. However, its still fun-- the original GTA3 engine is wildly unstable and crashes before i have time to get into the game, plus it has this awful blurry look to it even with trails off. However, when the map is rendered usign the vice city engine, the scenery is razor sharp, and it has yet to crash.
All the cars from GTA3 have been reproduced, and the motorcycles and helicopters added. I've always wanted to ride a PCG motorcycle through the tunnel connecting the 3 islands in liberty city, and now i can. it's as fun as it sounds, especially when you weave through traffic.)
Anyway, onto the point of this thread:
When the two cities are rendered with the same engine, Liberty city takes on a whole new look and that gritty feel is enhanced.
I like vice city for its sprawl and its beautiful scenery, but Liberty city had those cool bridges, plus the monorail on portland and the inter-island tunnel. Vice city had none of that, it had very simple concrete bridges that were nothing compared to the bridge connecting shoreside vale with staunton.
Liberty city seemed to be more balanced. The city seemed rather homogenized, with the most notable exceptions being on portland island.
Vice city has the feeling of being split down the middle, with the side you start on being the good commercialized side, and the other side having all the poverty and gang problems. it just didn't feel balanced.
For me, both are tied. I like liberty city for its functionality and redundant means of traveling between islands, and I like vice city for its wide open feel and beautiful scenery.
------------------
I have found that you can transform your character solely by the power of belief: as you believe yourself to be, so you shall become over time.
I was playing the liberty city mod for GTA:VC (which is basically a port of the GTA3 map to the much-improved VC engine. There are no missions, but you can wander around the map and steal cars, and thats about it. However, its still fun-- the original GTA3 engine is wildly unstable and crashes before i have time to get into the game, plus it has this awful blurry look to it even with trails off. However, when the map is rendered usign the vice city engine, the scenery is razor sharp, and it has yet to crash.
All the cars from GTA3 have been reproduced, and the motorcycles and helicopters added. I've always wanted to ride a PCG motorcycle through the tunnel connecting the 3 islands in liberty city, and now i can. it's as fun as it sounds, especially when you weave through traffic.)
Anyway, onto the point of this thread:
When the two cities are rendered with the same engine, Liberty city takes on a whole new look and that gritty feel is enhanced.
I like vice city for its sprawl and its beautiful scenery, but Liberty city had those cool bridges, plus the monorail on portland and the inter-island tunnel. Vice city had none of that, it had very simple concrete bridges that were nothing compared to the bridge connecting shoreside vale with staunton.
Liberty city seemed to be more balanced. The city seemed rather homogenized, with the most notable exceptions being on portland island.
Vice city has the feeling of being split down the middle, with the side you start on being the good commercialized side, and the other side having all the poverty and gang problems. it just didn't feel balanced.
For me, both are tied. I like liberty city for its functionality and redundant means of traveling between islands, and I like vice city for its wide open feel and beautiful scenery.
------------------
I have found that you can transform your character solely by the power of belief: as you believe yourself to be, so you shall become over time.