Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → Wow...
12
Wow...
2008-07-27, 4:51 PM #41
Originally posted by TimeWolfOfThePast:
If not that, Onimusha basically called you gay for living in California. :P

Oh yeah. Strike one all ready.

Greaaaaat. San Diego has another scandal! And we're just getting over the stripper one.

Edit: :snypa:
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2008-07-27, 4:58 PM #42
ok that was ball busting! ^


Not a homophobe at all. Indifferent to the max.
"They're everywhere, the little harlots."
-Martyn
2008-07-27, 5:36 PM #43
What's "ITT", In The Thread? I don't see how being a homophobe could get you banned, though. I know you're not supposed to call things gay but that's pretty lesbian anyway.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2008-07-27, 8:03 PM #44
Quote:
...a fetish? Scientists have found differences in the brains of straight people and gay people. I think it's a little more than a fetish.


Who's to say that they won't find the same things with people who really like sexy black stockings? You're not lowering 'gayness' to the level of a fetish, you're raising the fetishes up. You're just making everything equal, which is what you wanted in the first place, right?
2008-07-27, 8:13 PM #45
Originally posted by JM:
Who's to say that they won't find the same things with people who really like sexy black stockings? You're not lowering 'gayness' to the level of a fetish, you're raising the fetishes up. You're just making everything equal, which is what you wanted in the first place, right?

Are you a scientist sir? Do you have proof of this? Do you even have anything to back up your theory?

Armchair scientists UNITE!
D E A T H
2008-07-27, 8:29 PM #46
Originally posted by Avenger:
My god, Onimusha, you're an idiot.


For whatever reason, I just had a flashback of a thread on color-blindness several months back. Weren't you the one who suggested a person who is red/green colorblind will claim that the grass and trees are red?
2008-07-27, 8:38 PM #47
Erm, no. I dont know **** about being colorblind?
"They're everywhere, the little harlots."
-Martyn
2008-07-27, 10:28 PM #48
[http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth4616/images/colorblind1.jpg]
Why do the heathens rage behind the firehouse?
2008-07-27, 11:19 PM #49
The word "homophobe" is annoying. Almost as the annoying incessant use of the word "gay" a general purpose negative adjective.

I guess I'm just kind of a grumpy guy.
2008-07-27, 11:23 PM #50
Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet:
The word "homophobe" is annoying.


That which it describes is pretty annoying as well.
Why do the heathens rage behind the firehouse?
2008-07-28, 5:21 AM #51
What made you think a color-blindness test was relevant?
2008-07-28, 7:57 AM #52
Yay I'm not colorblind.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2008-07-28, 8:18 AM #53
Originally posted by Onimusha.:
gay = not a minority and should not receive ANY minority benefits. Homosexuality is an erotic "fetish" more then anything.


No. That's not what a fetish is.

Are people with a foot fetish only turned on by feet? I sincerely doubt it.

:carl:
nope.
2008-07-28, 8:48 AM #54
Originally posted by JM:
What made you think a color-blindness test was relevant?


Doing my part to educate Onimusha.
Why do the heathens rage behind the firehouse?
2008-07-28, 1:39 PM #55
Still irrevelent and out of context. I obviously know what the condition is.
"They're everywhere, the little harlots."
-Martyn
2008-07-28, 2:49 PM #56
... Homosexuals are discriminated against for their "fetish," BSDMers are not identifiable nor is there an active or obvious discrimination against them. Hence why homosexuality is regarded as a minority.

Your mal-informed judgment on the validity of minority rights for Homosexuals based on your irrefutable foot fetish logic does make you look pretty stupid.

That said, I don't think this was an issue of homophobia. "Hey, that's not just any old dancer drowning, that's a ***! Let's use this as a convenient opportunity to shoot him!" Seems just as unlikely as him being strong enough to threaten police officers after treading water for 20 minutes. The difference is that one is a case of shooting and killing a person, the other is a case of being particularly strong (likely while under the influence of alcohol).
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2008-07-28, 10:24 PM #57
Quote:
Your mal-informed judgment on the validity of minority rights for Homosexuals based on your irrefutable foot fetish logic does make you look pretty stupid.


OR you blatently fail to look at a situation from any other standpoint but your own., and thus disreguard them as "stupid". =D
"They're everywhere, the little harlots."
-Martyn
2008-07-29, 6:06 AM #58
Quote:
Are people with a foot fetish only turned on by feet? I sincerely doubt it.
And not all gay people are exclusive either. Try again.
12

↑ Up to the top!