Originally posted by Obi_Kwiet:
You can rationalize anything into absurdity. If the constitution is open to any all rationalization it's just as if we don't have one.
Oh wait....
Oh wait....
wut?
Yeah, at this point I'm just going to have to ask you to read Stevens' and Breyer's dissents. Or even just Scalia's majority opinion, because that alone ought to show that this issue isn't as open-and-shut as you think it is.
Again, I'm on the same side as you guys on this one, which only makes it more frustrating for me that you can't get it right.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.