Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → Why don't Republicans know how to draw?
Why don't Republicans know how to draw?
2008-09-14, 4:29 PM #1
Seriously, the only exception is the guy who draws "Mallard Fillmore." He's pretty good.

What is the deal, Republicans? Learning to draw takes nothing but hard work and discipline and you're supposed to be good at that. Come on.

Someone please help me figure this out
2008-09-14, 4:32 PM #2
They can draw the American flag, and most can draw a cross
2008-09-14, 4:32 PM #3
Can you post some examples please?
The Plothole: a home for amateur, inclusive, collaborative stories
http://forums.theplothole.net
2008-09-14, 4:34 PM #4
Because being artistic is something that only a HOMOSEXUAL COMMUNIST LIBERAL would do. I DONT GOT TIME FOR NONE OF THAT DRAWIN' STUFF, LETS GO SHOOT SOME A-RABS
Stuff
2008-09-14, 4:38 PM #5
Originally posted by Gebohq:
Can you post some examples please?

Examples of what?
2008-09-14, 4:48 PM #6
I mean if you want examples of Republicans not drawing that's kind of hard
2008-09-14, 4:51 PM #7
Well presumably they've tried drawing... certainly there must be some examples on the Internet? This is just the first I've heard of it.
The Plothole: a home for amateur, inclusive, collaborative stories
http://forums.theplothole.net
2008-09-14, 5:06 PM #8
Well, here's one:
[http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/679/incidusprojectos1mi5.jpg]
2008-09-14, 5:22 PM #9
mike lukovich sucks ***
2008-09-14, 5:47 PM #10
Is this just a thread to make fun of Wookie?
2008-09-14, 5:59 PM #11
nosir wookie is not an artist afaik
2008-09-14, 5:59 PM #12
Originally posted by JM:
Is this just a thread to make fun of Wookie?

What? No
2008-09-14, 6:04 PM #13
:cool:
2008-09-14, 6:04 PM #14
;)
2008-09-14, 6:05 PM #15
I just plain and simple suck at drawring :(
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2008-09-14, 6:07 PM #16
Originally posted by JediGandalf:
I just plain and simple suck at drawring :(


:(
2008-09-14, 6:09 PM #17
thrawn
2008-09-14, 6:10 PM #18
I didn't know you were a republican
2008-09-14, 6:15 PM #19
who?

thrawn, hi. can i be a part of this thread?
2008-09-14, 6:25 PM #20
of course everyone can be a part of this thread saberopus

what's up
2008-09-14, 6:49 PM #21
Originally posted by 'Thrawn[numbarz:
;946588']Seriously, the only exception is the guy who draws "Mallard Fillmore." He's pretty good.

What is the deal, Republicans? Learning to draw takes nothing but hard work and discipline and you're supposed to be good at that. Come on.

Someone please help me figure this out


My mom is a Republican and she can draw. She even teaches other people to draw regardless of their political leanings.
Pissed Off?
2008-09-14, 7:07 PM #22
T-two exceptions?
2008-09-14, 7:36 PM #23
I voted in the Republican primary this year, but I was unable to draw long before that.
If you think the waiters are rude, you should see the manager.
2008-09-14, 8:44 PM #24
I also voted in the republican primary, but I was able to draw long before that.
2008-09-14, 9:56 PM #25
Originally posted by JM:
I also voted in the republican primary, but I was able to draw long before that.

So you claim
2008-09-15, 6:08 AM #26
I'm also not a republican, so I can't be used as an example.

However, this thread is pointlessly stupid.
2008-09-15, 7:17 AM #27
Originally posted by JM:
Is this just a thread to make fun of Wookie?


Unrelated, but I'm quite sad that he's banned now. I disagree with him on almost everything, and he often infuriates me, but I still like him and I miss him now. :-(
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
2008-09-15, 7:31 AM #28
He's only gone for about a week right?
2008-09-15, 2:54 PM #29
It's just an example of this boards terrible leftist bias. We've got a ****-ton of democrats, a couple libertarians, and... wookie.
2008-09-15, 3:31 PM #30
Originally posted by JM:
I'm also not a republican, so I can't be used as an example.

However, this thread is pointlessly stupid.

Well, you may be ready to turn your back on these people but I'm not.
2008-09-15, 3:38 PM #31
Originally posted by JM:
It's just an example of this boards terrible leftist bias. We've got a ****-ton of democrats, a couple libertarians, and... wookie.


Haha, I'm always impressed by what constitutes as 'leftist' in America. Seriously, the rest of the world must seem like a socialist nightmare. American Libetarianism is pretty firmly right-wing.

If wookie was going to be banned for political bias reasons, it would've happened a long time ago.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
2008-09-15, 3:53 PM #32
Originally posted by Mort-Hog:
American Libetarianism is pretty firmly right-wing.


I thought it was fairly well-known that libertarians are far right, even within America. I mean, Ron Paul was as minimal government as they come, and he ran for the conservative Republican ticket.
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2008-09-15, 7:52 PM #33
How can a group be far-right when it believes in gay marriage, abortion, strict separation of church and state, legalization of marijuana, isolationism, stricter controls on police, and legalization of prostitution, to name a few? Libertarians are social liberals and economic conservatives. They have even less in common with the current real power in the Republican party, the neocons. This is why classifying ideologies on a strictly left---right continuum doesn't work.

Note: I know individual libertarians may hold different views on any particular subject, I'm just giving examples of general libertarian causes.
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2008-09-15, 8:02 PM #34
But all of those beliefs stem from an adherence to minimal government, which is a fairly right-wing belief.
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2008-09-15, 8:14 PM #35
I'm not the greatest but.. would you think that I can draw?
Attachment: 20025/350z2.jpg (94,315 bytes)
"Nulla tenaci invia est via"
2008-09-15, 9:28 PM #36
Originally posted by Wolfy:
But all of those beliefs stem from an adherence to minimal government, which is a fairly right-wing belief.
The right wing believes in minimal government when it comes to things like taxes, business regulation, and welfare programs. But they're more than happy to expand the powers of the police or use government to tell you who you can marry and what you can do to your body. Conservatives being "small government" logistically doesn't mean they don't use it to impose just as much regulation on people as the left wing does. The neocons of course aren't anywhere near small government, though.

To put it in an oversimplified way, the left wing uses the government to regulate socio-economic status, the right wing uses the government to regulate morality. Libertarians want them both to back off.
Democracy: rule by the stupid

↑ Up to the top!