Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Massassi has failed me once again
Massassi has failed me once again
2004-08-14, 3:49 PM #1
Well, with the recommendation from fellow Massassians, I bought Savage. Well, I got the patches and it doesn't glitch when I start it anymore. But now I guess no one plays on the in-game server. Wtf? Where do I go to find people who play this game? I don't want to have bought this game for nothing, like I did BF:Vietnam. That was recommended by Massassi too.

------------------
Debating politics on the internet is about as useful and productive as shoving a broomstick up your *** .

[This message has been edited by Kieran Horn (edited August 14, 2004).]
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2004-08-14, 4:05 PM #2
BF:Vietnam is awesome, a lot of people play it online still.

------------------
(>º_º)> ±h³ ѳv³®-£ⁿd¡תּ9 §±ºr¥ <(º_º<) | (>º_º)> תּℓζ ШǿѓЖ§|-Юρ <(º_º<)
Think while it's still legal.
2004-08-14, 4:27 PM #3
Don't blame anyone but yourself for buying a crappy game.

------------------
Brian's Web Log is CLOSED.
2004-08-14, 4:28 PM #4
The Specialists is awesome, a lot of people play it.

------------------
[url="http://gianturl.com?LslqYgMc,,zP3dd,3F9p8Zk,0,9LHkg7DS4bZW1Z4,PvH78r9v2svr7X,S,2cpBF,L
Hh3l2,6WPxP4,m28fBMzy4Rh,7xvzFHg4qS7k,qzG2K,7q6YSCXqP5x3,,1,,m5mC,gMrw4Xcx7,,,tg
LQw,F,J,p5X5,mCD7,p4fCJh9bc5kw,vmqWsl2h0V,6VRsy4b,9G6H,6,qdtM9PZ,ls,s0,N1rjwJ3hkwfr
nmfDV8G5J,,jT6bt3c7vh4,DVMkf3qX8dcz9yGnHkrr1hT8P8R4cC6Fx0qdl2,hKCH,b5wJY,,cVt,LPRx
RunXrp"]http://gianturl.com?LslqYgMc,,zP3dd,3F9p8Zk,0,9LHkg7DS4bZW1Z4,PvH78r9v2svr7X,S,2cpBF,L
Hh3l2,6WPxP4,m28fBMzy4Rh,7xvzFHg4qS7k,qzG2K,7q6YSCXqP5x3,,1,,m5mC,gMrw4Xcx7,,,tg
LQw,F,J,p5X5,mCD7,p4fCJh9bc5kw,vmqWsl2h0V,6VRsy4b,9G6H,6,qdtM9PZ,ls,s0,N1rjwJ3hkwfr
nmfDV8G5J,,jT6bt3c7vh4,DVMkf3qX8dcz9yGnHkrr1hT8P8R4cC6Fx0qdl2,hKCH,b5wJY,,cVt,LPRx
RunXrp[/url]
He's Watching you
…../|,-‘`¯¯`\(o)_\,----,,,_………
…( `\(o),,_/` ¯ : o : : : o`-, ….
2004-08-14, 4:42 PM #5
*shoots PhoenixFlame with his new Master Bow* NOT AGAIN!

------------------
Debating politics on the internet is about as useful and productive as shoving a broomstick up your *** .
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2004-08-14, 4:52 PM #6
Maybe afterhours? Sometimes when I play SOCOM 2 or Some Half-life mods.. They suck for not having a certin amount of people on..

------------------
-- [url="mailto:Jatso_jk1@hotmail.com"]mailto:Jatso_jk1@hotmail.com[/url]Jatso_jk1@hotmail.com</A>--The Bounty Hunters Arc Forum--Firehound Inc.--
-- Jatso_jk1@hotmail.com--The Bounty Hunters Arc Forum--Firehound Inc.--
2004-08-14, 5:21 PM #7
The Specialists is a HL mod. Really good, too. Not very played (got a DECENT following), but still good.

BF:Nam was amazing. Don't know why you didn't like it. But they have demos, you know. [http://forums.massassi.net/html/tongue.gif]

------------------
There is no signature
D E A T H
2004-08-14, 6:09 PM #8
I didn't like BF:V because the servers are crappy. More of a problem with the company than the game I guess. And a little more processor power on my part would help.

------------------
Debating politics on the internet is about as useful and productive as shoving a broomstick up your *** .

[This message has been edited by Kieran Horn (edited August 14, 2004).]
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2004-08-15, 8:13 AM #9
So in other words, it sucks because it doesn't run well, and because there's still bugs in it? :P

------------------
There is no signature
D E A T H
2004-08-15, 8:19 AM #10
Pretty much. Having the best game in the world doesn't matter if the servers are sub-par.

------------------
Debating politics on the internet is about as useful and productive as shoving a broomstick up your *** .
Democracy: rule by the stupid
2004-08-15, 9:01 AM #11
Nam should not have been released in the state the original version was in. It was just too buggy, and still is after v1.1

------------------
ZGPC
2004-08-15, 12:32 PM #12
Nam sucks, just get BF1942 ans then get EOD...

------------------

"Bantha's are filthy animals.......I don't eat filthy animals."

"Laugh it up Fuzzball!"
-Han Solo
2004-08-15, 12:46 PM #13
Fact - bfv multiplayer sucked because of the amount of detail, i had bad lag with 8 ppl on it, i can have 64 ppl on bf 1942 with no lag at all

------------------
And as we wind on down the road
Our shadows taller than our souls
nope.
2004-08-15, 1:01 PM #14
I could have 64 people on a Nam server and run it just fine, 1024x768 medium detail. Just fine meaning there wasn't any visible lag. Of course, I only played Ia Drang, so eh...

------------------
There is no signature
D E A T H
2004-08-15, 1:03 PM #15
I much prefered VietCong multiplayer to BF:V, the whole thing was about stealth [http://forums.massassi.net/html/biggrin.gif] There aren't many multiplayer games where you can use stealth tactics so well.

------------------
╔═════════════╦══════════════════╗
║ TheJkWhoSaysNi║ -----@% (Snail racing. ) .║
╠═════════════╩══════════════════╣
║Warning: This post may contain traces of nut║
╚════════════════════════════════╝
TheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWho
SaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTh
eJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSa
ysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJ
k
WhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSays
N
iTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkW
2004-08-15, 1:09 PM #16
I love how the Vietnam multi is so friggin...realistic! I mean you're creeping through the bush, waiting for someone to kill you, with your Carbine out, looking left and right, and you spot a 'charlie'. So you go prone, aim at him, and pow, he's down. Five seconds later, a sniper's caught your muzzle flash, and pow, you're down. So awesome.

------------------
There is no signature
D E A T H

↑ Up to the top!