Mort-Hog
If moral relativism is wrong, I don't wanna be right.
Posts: 4,192
I wish the guy had posted more examples, because then I could counter them and make him look more stupid.
Firstly, Middle-Earth is in the East. If it's geographic symbolism you're looking for, it'd have to be somewhere in Asia.
When Theoden refers to the "great warriors of the West" he is referring to Numenore. This is a land that was raised for Men, but it was later sunk during the marring of Arda. If it's symbolism you're looking for, the sinking of the West, then this'd appear to be symbolic of the fall of the white race, perhaps? (Or perhaps a Nostradamus-esque prophecy of the World Trade Centre attacks?) Again, not quite what this blokey is wanting to get at.
As for all evil being portrayed as 'black'... Well, he may be getting at something here, but it's something that's far bigger than just Tolkien's work.. Historically, evil has been represented by the colour black, even before Europeans discovered black people (there may or may not be some Bible references to back this up? I wouldn't be surprised if there were, but I'm sure that most people here would know of this better than I). It is unfortunate that African peoples have been labelled 'black' together with the 'evil' connotation (though I certainly don't think it is a coincidence), but it is not the fault of Tolkien. You could argue the same for a whole host of literature, Shakespeare noteably.
It's odd that the most obvious 'ism' has been overlooked in terms of Tolkien; sexism. Bearing in mind the time in which Tolkien was working, and also that the works are set in an unspecified imaginary time in the past, it is not surprising that his works have a distinctly sexist tone. However, that sexism appears to be quite deliberate, especially the character of Eowyn, a symbol of women's struggle for equality, and Aragorn's blatant disregard for her skills. Although it clearly isn't the most important feature, Tolkien did make an important statement about sexism in pre-modern society and its existance in society now (or rather, then). Anyway...
As for someone or rather saying that racism is 'human nature'.. I find this very hard to believe. I think it inconcieveable that there should be some genetic hatred for other ethnic groups. In fact, 'human nature' is quite the oxymoron for humans are not controlled by instinctive urges like other animals; humans are defined by society. A newborn baby is a blank sheet of paper, and would die were it not for society. There are numerous reports of children being raised by dogs or monkeys or whatever, and they act like those dogs or monkeys; if a monkey or a dog is raised by humans they do not start acting like humans. It's society that creates racism and sexism. But why? Because racism and sexism are necessary elements of capitalism, necessary to break up and divide the proles into opposing factions; this way, the proles cannot unite. This is one of the reasons why the Revolution hasn't happened in Britain or America yet.
Anyway, whatever.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935