Don't know if this is old news. But it seems pretty genius.

To fix your tags you want to delete the entire url apart from whats after the v=.

Just that code between the tags.

Where can i invest in this?

Ugh, I'm sick of seeing knuckledraggers claim this is something special. Electrolysis requires a huge amount of energy, far more than you get from the hydrogen that results.

It doesn't work. The people pushing these ideas are either hoaxers or idiots.

Mostly idiots.

As an ex astrophysics student i can safely announce this to be mostly bull****. More energy is needed to turn water into Peroxide HHO than is released when it reacts, and while it may provide a new fuel for combustion engines to run on, it will never provide electrical energy for the national grid. WIthin the realms of Hydrogen, only Fusion could manage such a feat. and thats still decades away.

Asides from that

OMFG COOL

if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}

This is bunk.

I didn't actually post it for the "alternative fuel source" aspect. Mostly because of it's awesome blowtorch aspect.

Oh?

So why post some blowhard's version who is trying to claim that he invented the process when he clearly did not?

Awesome blowtorch? It's just burning hydrogen. I'm pretty sure the nozzle being cool to the touch has everything to do with the shape and design of the nozzle and nothing to do with the fuel.

Keep in mind that I'm not claiming that he invented it. You seem to think that there was some point to this other than the blowtorch.

A local guy here years ago (like 10-20) designed a car that ran on water. My friends grand parents housed him. He built a silo for solar power on their property.

He had a meeting with "someone" at crackle barrel and supposedly he was poisoned then died. The car is in a hidden location now.

And if you believe that, I have a bridge to sell to you...

It was in the news paper, the news, I can't believe no body else has heard that story

Some people forget the difference between things that work, and things that work efficiently.

But food poisoning and Cracker Barrel isn't surprising.

Sounds like this guy.

the main problem with the conspiracies say people are killed to supress free energy is that it would be FAR more profitable to sell those devices at huge cost with huge liscencing fees.

I mean, do you know how much money the oil companies actualy spend to GET the oil in the first place, they do investigations into new sites (which cost lots of money, and may not even find a new site), they build the things to get the oil out of the ground, they transport it to the refineries, and then they have to get it to the places to sell it (not to mention there are probably many other costs as well), something that can replace oil would be of great benefit to these companies, as it would also reduce thier costs of operating.

yeah that's the guy

It wouldn't be of great benefit to them if the inventor/patent holder didn't let them buy into it.

Guys I invented perpetual motion and a means to get more energy out of a closed system than is available.

dalf, you can't create energy from loneliness.

I hear thats how Rob powers his truck.

but why would they kill the guy, and then HIDE the thing. I mean, wouldnt it make more sense to steal it, figure out how it works, and then release a slightly differant one?

Not while there's still oil (not that I believe this is what happened).

To be honest it'd be much easier to do things while there still is a lot of oil floating around.

Not just used for fuel, after all. Can't make plastics out of alternative forms of energy, for one.

but you can make em out of peanuts!