[rant]
-gate.
The laziest single suffix in all of journalism right now is -gate. I don't know if it's a UK thing or whether this blight is spreading to other countries, or indeed whether it has spread here from foreign fields but it is doing my bleedin' head in.
Currently in the news we have (ok, so I use the word "currently" quite loosely)
Bloodgate: the use of blood capsules in rugby to gain an extra, uncounted, substitution under the guise of a real injury.
Crashgate: in Formula 1 racing, Nelson Piquet Jr. claims he was ordered by his team to crash in order to deploy the safety car to the advantage of his team-mate Fernando Alonso.
Sachsgate: Radio scandal whereupon Russel Brand and Jonathan Ross left a totally inappropriate but nevertheless funny message on the answering machine of Andrew Sachs. Both were reprimanded by the BBC.
I could go on: there's even a list on wikipedia of famous -gate scandals, which leads me to reason that there are probably dozens of blogs, articles, tweets or whatever saying exactly what I am now, and yes I spot the irony of repeating the words of others whilst berating the media for repeating the same lazy idiom over and over again at least I'm not getting paid to write this.
Well, again, ironically I'm skiving at work: I'm uninstalling several defunct versions of AutoCAD from my work PC so technically I'm being paid whilst writing this rant.
Anyways, I feel far better having got this off my chest.
I beg of you, journalists, who are clearly not reading this, use your latent psychic powers to take in this little rant, then use your comprehension to realise that I am right, and you are lazy. Please, the word "scandal" is not only acceptable to describe a scandal, it is the correct word to describe scandal.
Love,
Martyn
[/rant]
-gate.
The laziest single suffix in all of journalism right now is -gate. I don't know if it's a UK thing or whether this blight is spreading to other countries, or indeed whether it has spread here from foreign fields but it is doing my bleedin' head in.
Currently in the news we have (ok, so I use the word "currently" quite loosely)
Bloodgate: the use of blood capsules in rugby to gain an extra, uncounted, substitution under the guise of a real injury.
Crashgate: in Formula 1 racing, Nelson Piquet Jr. claims he was ordered by his team to crash in order to deploy the safety car to the advantage of his team-mate Fernando Alonso.
Sachsgate: Radio scandal whereupon Russel Brand and Jonathan Ross left a totally inappropriate but nevertheless funny message on the answering machine of Andrew Sachs. Both were reprimanded by the BBC.
I could go on: there's even a list on wikipedia of famous -gate scandals, which leads me to reason that there are probably dozens of blogs, articles, tweets or whatever saying exactly what I am now, and yes I spot the irony of repeating the words of others whilst berating the media for repeating the same lazy idiom over and over again at least I'm not getting paid to write this.
Well, again, ironically I'm skiving at work: I'm uninstalling several defunct versions of AutoCAD from my work PC so technically I'm being paid whilst writing this rant.
Anyways, I feel far better having got this off my chest.
I beg of you, journalists, who are clearly not reading this, use your latent psychic powers to take in this little rant, then use your comprehension to realise that I am right, and you are lazy. Please, the word "scandal" is not only acceptable to describe a scandal, it is the correct word to describe scandal.
Love,
Martyn
[/rant]