Very true. While the top four gold winners were US/China/Russia/Australlia, coincidentially, they also sent some of the largest delegations. Here's a breakdown of the delegations of the top 11:
- USA: 1,418. Golds: 35. Ratio: 0.024682
- China: 744. Golds: 32. Ratio: 0.043010
- Russia: 826. Golds: 27. Ratio: 0.032687
- Australia: 711. Golds: 17. Ratio: 0.023909
- Japan: 450. Golds: 16. Ratio: 0.035555
- Germany: 706. Golds: 14. Ratio: 0.019830
- Italy: 749. Golds: 10. Ratio: 0.013351
- Korea: 320. Golds: 9. Ratio: 0.028125
- Great Britian: 355. Golds: 9. Ratio: 0.025352
- Cuba: 193. Golds: 9. Ratio: 0.046632
- Ukraine: 343. Golds: 9. Ratio: 0.026239
By this list, the performance of each country would be like this:
- 1. Cuba (Blast you, Fidel Castro!)
- 2. China (And THEY get to host the next Games, for a home advantage!)
- 3. Japan (Just how many olympians CAN they cram into such a small place?! It's got roughly 40% of the US's population, 48% of the US's medals!)
- 4. Russia (They really soaked up Bronzes, so they'd be higher up if I counted ALL medals)
- 5. South Korea (A lot of medals for a mere 320 athletes!)
- 6. Ukraine (Western Europe has some catching up to do!)
- 7. Great Britian (As I just said.)
- 8. USA (That delegation was nearly double the second largest! That's crazy!)
- 9. Australia (Athletes are a popular investement down there, eh?)
- 10. Germany (Over 50 Olympians needed to get each gold!)
- 11. Italy (Over 70 Olympians needed for each gold!)
Enough of that anyway... I'm tired.
::Covers head in preparation for countless flames::
------------------
"
I know there's got to be some sort of mathematical equation for this sort of thing, but I prefer trial and error. It's one of the advantages of having a socialized health care system."
[This message has been edited by nottheking (edited August 30, 2004).]