Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

☖ Forums → Discussion Forum → How good is Assassin's Creed (PC)
12
How good is Assassin's Creed (PC)
2009-12-23, 6:29 PM #41
Have to admit that is generally annoying.
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2009-12-23, 7:48 PM #42
AC1 is worse. You don't just lose equipment. And you don't get to FIND it. The way you gain it back is totally unrewarding. Despite getting a reward!

Also, you lose skills. Altair still knows how to counter. So why the hell can't he? Because someone says you can't? Stupid.
2009-12-23, 8:20 PM #43
What JM said. He suddenly doesn't know how to perform physical moves because some guy said he couldn't do them anymore? Please.
>>untie shoes
2009-12-24, 12:27 AM #44
What confused me about AC2 is how Ezio knew how to scale enormous buldings with no effort from the very beginning, when he was a strapping lad with just a crush on a young girl. Game shoulda started you out confined to the streets of Florence with no ability to climb anything but ladders. God knows that would have been the only part of the game I would be able to appreciate the crowd dynamics of that game. The instant I was let loose, I scurried about the rooftops and traversed the entire city in a few minutes. Didn't set foot in the streets ever again. :hist101:
DO NOT WANT.
2009-12-24, 5:19 AM #45
Something one of the heralds said cleared that up near the beginning. Also explains why they care so much about people being on rooftops, to the extent of shooting arrows at them. He said something to the effect of "It has been a recent trend for young men to climb buildings and run across the city over the rooftops. While not illegal, per se, it will inevitably end in someone breaking their legs."

I guess the game is set around the invention of parkour >.>
2009-12-25, 7:29 AM #46
Actually JM that is a very valid point. You couldn't relearn how to grab ledges until an old man tell you so...
2009-12-25, 7:34 AM #47
Originally posted by LividDK:
I guess the game is set around the invention of parkour >.>


Despite parkour being a french invention? :v:
DO NOT WANT.
2009-12-25, 8:48 AM #48
Originally posted by LividDK:
Something one of the heralds said cleared that up near the beginning. Also explains why they care so much about people being on rooftops, to the extent of shooting arrows at them. He said something to the effect of "It has been a recent trend for young men to climb buildings and run across the city over the rooftops. While not illegal, per se, it will inevitably end in someone breaking their legs."

I guess the game is set around the invention of parkour >.>


Someone potentially breaking their own legs is justifiable means to shoot them?
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2009-12-25, 5:17 PM #49
Originally posted by Deadman:
Someone potentially breaking their own legs is justifiable means to shoot them?

Yes! And anyone else who decides to frolic amongst the rooftops! Including the Hogfather!

Originally posted by Zell:
Despite parkour being a french invention? :v:

Quiet, you.
2009-12-25, 5:32 PM #50
Originally posted by JM:
AC1 is worse. You don't just lose equipment. And you don't get to FIND it. The way you gain it back is totally unrewarding. Despite getting a reward!


AC1 is exactly what this thread is about =p
You can't judge a book by it's file size
12

↑ Up to the top!