http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/12/how-buttsecks-works.html [Language NSFW]

Summary : If we legalize gay marriage, we'll all get ****ed in the ***.

I learned a new word today. Coprophilia (the paraphilia involving sexual pleasure from feces). It's like there's this whole world out there that I wasn't aware of. Thanks internet!

Hmm. I did hear some good things about prostate stimulation.

yeah, cum race horse style

Are we allowed to say 'race horse' here?

Never saw 2 girls 1 cup?

If gays are married, they are bound to one another and should therefore be less likely to go around trying to ram people in the ***.

/gag reflex induced

Based on the replies the original post has generated I'm gonna ... Not click the link. I'm about to cook breakfast.

its just a republican politician talking about penis & wiggling & excrement & ***

Ugh. I even tend to vote republican but from a social standpoint I really can't ****ing stand them. For a party that bases it's ideals on small government they should really stop giving a **** about stuff like this.

Republicans don't base their ideals on small government.

No, but they're getting pretty good at convincing people that they do. They conveniently forget to mention that their concept of a "strong national defense" actually means that they'll have a vast number of government employees in the form of a military. Republicans are generally defined by their support of "free markets" (anti-regulation), "strict constructionism" (a fundamentalist (imagine that) view of the constitution), "strong national defense" (despite the fact that they were once against the idea of being involved in "foreign entanglements") & they're generally "skeptical" (many would argue disingenuously) of science that negates their political (e.g. global warming) & religious (e.g. evolution) ideology.

Note: Not all Republicans are/were religious (many would argue that many of our forefathers (as well as current politicians) are/were "Deists" or "skeptics" (possibly even agnostic/atheist) but that it's quite likely that they are/were forced to pander to the religious) but they're currently overwhelmingly Christian, despite the fact that many of their political "principles" could be argued to be contrary to Christian ideology (e.g. Psalm 41:1, 2 &/or 1 Timothy 6:17, 18).

Wow. I'm speechless.

Republicans want small government when it's dealing with the government's hand in economic affairs, but they want heavy regulation on policies regarding our lifestyles and other personal affairs.

Um your wrong

Um, let's look at two major issues here: (and obviously this is just a very general scope of things)

Abortion - Republicans want made illegal.

Same-sex marriage: - Republicans want the government to prevent this from happening.

Both of these involve the government playing a large role in society's personal lives and choices. I'm not sure how this disagrees with the statement i made above.

A lot of Republican and Democrat politicians are progressive, so they believe in regulation of the economy and personal affairs.



Abortion: It should be illegal.

Same-sex marriage: Republican and Democrat progressives both want to regulate marriage at the federal level. The easiest choice would be to leave the federal government out of it for now.

Don't get me wrong, I wasn't trying to advocate my belief for abortion being legal, I was simply making a non-biased statement. My personal thoughts are that abortion should be illegal in most cases, save for the mother's life being in jeopardy, or possibly for rape victims. Although that's only a very small percentage of the total number of abortions.

Why should a woman that wants an abortion not be permitted to have one?


How does one justify discrimination?

So you're saying banning same-sex marriage would not affect the lifestyles and personal affairs of homosexuals?

Is this based in your unshakable belief in magic, or does this stance have anything based in reality?

1. Killing innocent children isn't a good thing.

2. Exactly how is non-regulated marriage discrimination? Why does the government have to decide who marries who?

[QUOTE=Lord Kuat]Is this based in your unshakable belief in magic, or does this stance have anything based in reality?[/QUOTE]

The Bible isn't the only source that says murder is bad.

Oh here we go -_-

Where's the religious debate forum when you need it?

This isn't a religious debate.

Oh man this is going to be good.

Would I allow that to happen to me?

Not yet, give it a few posts though.

Bringing religion into it is stupid. Anakin didn't bring it up. Kuat didn't attack Anakin's position; he attacked Anakin's religion. Kuat is the one who's stupid here.

There are many Christians who are pro-choice. And many atheists who are pro-life.

guys lets talk about the wiggling weiners in **** part

I don't want my weiner to ever touch poop. I will go on record saying this.

By your exclusion, I will assume you're okay with your poop touching a weiner.

not that there's anything wrong with that

What a man does with my poop in his own home is his business and his alone.

What a man does with your poop in your *** is your business.

what a man does with his business is his business

So you don't ever want to bang a woman in the butt? You're just letting the best in life pass you by.

Maybe he only wants to bang a woman in the butt after she's thoroughly cleaned

does she have to have her butthole bleached first, too?