Originally posted by Koobie:
I liked the Fallout 3 DLC, but I think most of them should've been available in the game from the get-go. For example, the Brotherhood of Steel one (where the game doesn't end at the purifier and lets you play on a la FO2).
Saying such features should have been in the game from the get-go is pretty naive. Fallout 3 alone was a full-fledged, quality product. If you combine the 4 dlc packs together, you have a rather significant amount of time to the game. I'd say Anchorage, the Pitts and Point Lookout alone add well near 10-15 hours of gameplay, the equivalent of many stand-alone games. Hell, more recent games like Splinter Cell are but a fraction of that.
Those 4 dlc's alone are better considered as an expansion more than anything. They were not things the developer promised from the get-go and later excluded from the game at release.
Fallout 3's dlc weren't ready pre-release and there are no reasons game owners should be entitled to them for free, feel cheated or claim that these should have come with the basic game. In a short, shallow game, sure. In a game as extensive and fleshed out as Fallout 3 was as a stand-alone product, it just doesn't bear weight.
Was cheated out of lions by happydud
Was cheated out of marriage by sugarless
Was cheated out of marriage by sugarless