Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → general physics arguements
general physics arguements
2010-07-23, 8:11 AM #1
I'm in one of those moods where i dont understand the way the universe works and it makes me angry.

Whilst having a ciggie and tea, I started thinking about atoms and electrons and photons.
The main thing pissing me off right now are the 4 fundamental forces.

I just about got my head around weak and strong nuclear forces, even though most of the theory on this by leading scientists seem to be guess work even when they back it up with equations (math is very fluid, i believe u can make any old bollocks up and prove it with complex non standard math)

Gravity is pissing me off though.
Lets keep it simple for now.
So gravity influences mass right?
Light "has no mass"
Why is light affected by gravity*?

So perhaps we all jump in here and say "even massless particles can be affected by gravity"

That's just a cop out to me. And then theres the particle/wave duality, or energy=mass.

Just like when a high energy gamma rays create an e+ and e-, mass and energy are interchangeable, then why not assume that EVERYTHING has mass, but photons just have so little we havent detected it.

* OR are photons only affected by the twisting and compression of space time created by gravity, rather than "gravitons" themselves


DISCUSS
:tinfoil:
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2010-07-23, 8:15 AM #2
I'm pissing in the wind here but it's worth noting that while photons have no mass, they do have momentum. I want to suggest that has something to do with it but I dunno.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2010-07-23, 8:29 AM #3
The obvious question here (at least to myself who has very little knowledge of science) is: do photons have zero mass or is it just "near zero" mass... if the latter i think it answers your question.

edit: To turn it on its head, shouldn't you be able to work out how much mass a photon has by looking at how much it is affected by gravity?
TheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWho
SaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTh
eJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSa
ysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJ
k
WhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSays
N
iTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkWhoSaysNiTheJkW
2010-07-23, 8:37 AM #4
Ni has it. Photons must have some non-zero mass.

Or, it's possible that all the fundamental forces are the same force acting in different ways, and that's why gravity affects light.
2010-07-23, 8:38 AM #5
I AM WRONG
A dream is beautiful because it remains a dream.
2010-07-23, 8:39 AM #6
Originally posted by JM:

Or, it's possible that all the fundamental forces are the same force acting in different ways, and that's why gravity affects light.


see, i like this. They've already suggested that electromagnetism and weak nuclear force are the same force above 8GeV or something
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2010-07-23, 8:44 AM #7
Edit: SORRY I THOUGHT THIS WAS A SERIOUS THREAD but it looks like everyone else is just goofing off. I suppose "photons must have mass" should have clued me in.

In light of this,

lol photons aren't affected by mass unless we're talking about ur mom; she's so heavy she even attracts photons
Stuff
2010-07-23, 8:53 AM #8
Originally posted by Gettleburger:
I haven't taken physics in LONG time, but if you know the momentum of the photon (p), you can solve for the force on the photon (F), and do a simple mass = Force divided by 9.8m/s^2 using F=MA (force = mass * acceleration, where acceleration is gravity).

but i haven't done physics in a looooooooong time and I can't remember the equation for momentum. And I might be totally wrong if gravity isn't supposed to go there.


or is it using its known momentum to solve for the acceleration of the photon, and the force is gravity?


:omg:


Momentum is mass*velocity. There is no force involved in an unchanging momentum. If momentum is changing thats a different story. (F=d/dt(mv)) But I really don't think it's that simple in this context.

Hasn't it already been established that classical mechanics can be just about thrown out the window when studying particle behavior anyway?
2010-07-23, 8:56 AM #9
Sorry, the last time I took physics was 5 years ago. I will just stay quiet and read the thread then and not confuse anyone else :)
A dream is beautiful because it remains a dream.
2010-07-23, 8:57 AM #10
Originally posted by kyle90:
Photons are following straight paths through a curved spacetime.


I was just going to write this and leave it at that.
2010-07-23, 8:57 AM #11
Can't feel acceleration? What about those guys that slowed light down to where they could see it travelling through a medium?
Little angel go away
Come again some other day
Devil has my ear today
I'll never hear a word you say
2010-07-23, 8:59 AM #12
I don't know enough about physics to really comment.... sadly. Someday that may change.

I still don't understand how radio waves can travel through space, if space is a (near) vacuum.

I should really get back to school.
Quote Originally Posted by FastGamerr
"hurr hairy guy said my backhair looks dumb hurr hairy guy smash"
2010-07-23, 9:10 AM #13
Originally posted by Martyn:
I was just going to write this and leave it at that.


but that statement explains nothing. You have to show it in most basic terms, ie, what it all looks like in 3d, would be a good place to start.

Kyles post showed only an example of HOW things work.
We want the WHY.
Curved spacetime? curved by what? the example of the star, or is ALL space time curved, and as soon as it isnt, photons no longer travel in a straight line?

See. The way standard physics is explained doesnt work for everyone.
We all think differently. This is not a subtle way of saying "some of us are thick"
Mozart was just as much a genius as Einstein, but saw the world through music rather than math. etc etc
Code:
if(getThingFlags(source) & 0x8){
  do her}
elseif(getThingFlags(source) & 0x4){
  do other babe}
else{
  do a dude}
2010-07-23, 9:18 AM #14
Spacetime is curved by gravity, right?

Any mass is gonna make things all bendy. It's just noticeable when it's star-sized and above.
Hey, Blue? I'm loving the things you do. From the very first time, the fight you fight for will always be mine.
2010-07-23, 10:10 AM #15
Edit: again, never mind. RADIO WAVES TRAVEL BY MAGIC AND FAIRY DUST
Stuff
2010-07-23, 10:13 AM #16
No kyle radio waves are sound waves remember
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2010-07-23, 10:18 AM #17
...are you claiming that they're not?

:confused:
2010-07-23, 10:19 AM #18
Also F=mv
Stuff
2010-07-23, 10:19 AM #19
Yeah see this doesn't make any sense Emon you are making some bogus claims that cannot be backed up by "science" and now you are back peddling -_o
2010-07-23, 10:20 AM #20
Originally posted by Emon:
No kyle radio waves are sound waves remember


Haha I knew they weren't the same, but didn't realize they weren't really related at all. Anyway, thanks for :eng101:ing me
Quote Originally Posted by FastGamerr
"hurr hairy guy said my backhair looks dumb hurr hairy guy smash"
2010-07-23, 10:23 AM #21
It's a reference to that one guy that thought radio waves were the same as sound waves.
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2010-07-23, 10:29 AM #22
Originally posted by Ruthven:
but that statement explains nothing. You have to show it in most basic terms, ie, what it all looks like in 3d, would be a good place to start.


Spacetime curvature is a tensor field. You need 6* dimensions of data to show what it "looks" like.

(* Maybe more, I'm not an astrophysicist.)
2010-07-23, 10:44 AM #23
Gravity was invented by the Dutch.
This signature agrees with the previously posted signatures. To violate previously posted signatures is a violation of the EULA for this signature and you will be subject to unruly behavior.
2010-07-23, 11:12 AM #24
Quote Originally Posted by FastGamerr
"hurr hairy guy said my backhair looks dumb hurr hairy guy smash"
2010-07-23, 11:14 AM #25
Originally posted by Jon`C:
Spacetime curvature is a tensor field. You need 6* dimensions of data to show what it "looks" like.

(* Maybe more, I'm not an astrophysicist.)


Otherwise known as "Martyn would make a total hash of explaining it beacuse he only knows what he was taught at A-Level and from reading Hawkins' books"
2010-07-23, 11:33 AM #26
Originally posted by Ruthven:
(math is very fluid, i believe u can make any old bollocks up and prove it with complex non standard math)


Not that your explanation would matter. I think kyle90 has the right idea here.
2010-07-23, 11:37 AM #27
lol all physics is wrong because its based on calculus but spacetime is probably quantized so you cant differentiate over it!!
2010-07-23, 11:52 AM #28
B-but.. my smooth functions!

:effort:
Stuff
2010-07-23, 12:39 PM #29
http://www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/basics/wonderquest/photonmass.htm

:{
"The only crime I'm guilty of is love [of china]"
- Ruthven
me clan me mod
2010-07-23, 12:41 PM #30
USA today? ****ing serious?
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.

↑ Up to the top!