mb makes a claim against Antony, arguing that Antony should be outlawed because he is a total dick.

Antony asserts in response that he is not a total dick, and in the alternative that total dickery should not be outlawed. He also asserts a counterclaim against mb, arguing that mb should be outlawed because he is a fat fat fatty.

Opening the thread now to briefs from the litigants, and amicus briefs from other interested parties.

mb is also Italian, which in accordance with being fat, means there is some form of illegal activity going on here.

Also, mb cannot skateboard:

That guy has so much opportunity to stop and hits it SO HARD regardless, that i am having trouble breathing.

As I regained my composure i noticed the equally large child who lumbers slowly to retrieve the skateboard, leaving Stumbles there to his imminent face-smash.

Your honor. I would like to submit to the Court the case of Rob v. Massassi. In this case the plaintiff (Rob) sued the defendant (Massassi) on being wrongfully banned. The plaintiff argued that being a total dick was backed by his 1st Amendment rights and that he should not have been banned for his posts. The defendant argued that although he was guaranteed his 1st Amendment protections, the defendant argued that his inflammatory remarks gave cause for public concern causing an undue upheaval and panic response. Think yelling "fire" in a crowded building where there is none. Ultimately the 9th Circuit ruled in favor of Massassi and Rob's ban was upheld.

Your Honor, it is my belief that my client was exercising his right as administrator of a privately held institution upon which it may set rules and regulations how it may see fit as to benefit all parties. Furthermore, the plaintiff might accuse my client of discriminating against the plaintiff on the grounds of gender and/or race. I would like to counter that argument by saying that both plaintiff and my client are both Caucasian males.

This court accepts as axiomatic that there is no unqualified free speech right in this jurisdiction. We note, however, that no one has banned anyone in the instant case, so shut the **** up. If you're looking for someone to make a ruling on appeal from Rob v. Massassi, then... affirmed.

Vote no on yes and yes on NOOOOOOOOOOOOO.

The jury thinks we should make dickery mandatory.

I can out-dick any of you.

When the hell did Massassi stop being a dictatorship?

I overrule all previous votes and rule that both should be outlawed for wasting my time.

OBJECTION! CALLS FOR SPECULATION!

"SUSTAINED! MR. MATLOCK..."

<(But your honor...!)

Is this some BS from the chat?

****in' massassi elites with their inside joke threads...

**** 'em

Yes.

This is about BASIC FREEDOMS!

You've obviously never been to italy. And he's also Irish which means he has a genetic beergut.

Irish mafia.

Fat Pat is up to no good. He needs to be outlawed.

Let it be known by the members of the Jury that the song is incorrect and it is in fact Bad Bad Patrick Cartelli that is the fattest man in the whole damn town.

So says the Scot...

This gene is also found in Wales, Cornwall and Brittany!

Don't worry, Antony. I have a foolproof strategy to get you out of here. Surprise witnesses, each more surprising than the last. The judge won't know what hit him.

I am outraged! mb is lewd, lascivious, salacious, outrageous!

I resemble that remark!

You don't need double talk, you need Bob Loblaw!

Do not miss The Bob Loblaw Law Blog.

.

Yeah but cool matty's opinion doesn't count because he eats sweet chili.

Antony Braw braw BRAW BRAW! HOOAH.

since lawyers are being posted

I was going to McCoy it but I couldn't think of anything McCoyesque to say.

Also Antony wins as McCoy is unbeatable.

My opinion is law.

Also, it's not sweet chili. That's why you put ridiculously awesome hotsauce in it.