Hehe that's pretty funny.

Also, welcome to Massassi!

Brian:

Kroko you have a grammer mistake in your sig, it should be their's not theres.

Vornskr, please tell me you're not serious.

In the odd case you are, it should actually be "there's" as in "there is."

<(Doh-hoh-hoh-hoh!)

Obi-wan does kind of resemble Jesus, then he sacrificed himself to save everyone else, then was talking to luke in his head... hmm..



I really don't think he was being serious, that sentence was full of classic grammar mistakes which I believe was on purpose.

It's quite obviously on purpose

I was about to say that too, except I think Vornskr might have been serious =p

Well that wouldn't surprise me either

that poor alot

your quite obviously on purpose

An argument:

In the image above, posted by "Brian", we see Jesus giving praise to the Death Star, a technological terror constructed by a totalitarian regime. Since Jesus is the Son of God, we can also say the God supports the Empire. Again, a dictatorial regime bent on maintaining control by whatever means necessary. God's support of a dictatorship can be linked in Scripture by several references of "my way or the highway." Don't ask for specifics, I'm too drunk to look them up. The United States (and also, the Rebel Alliance) is a republican form of government based on a representative democracy, the antithesis of what the Empire and God stand for. So, we can draw conclusions that God does not infact bless America, He probably curses and condemns it. As such, we cannot trust God. So we can stop wasting the bottom of the 7th inning every Sunday game singing "God Bless America" since He doesn't and we can remove "In God we trust" from our currency since we cannot.

Thank you.

I think dalf has the right idea.

But... in the image above it seems more like Jesus is setting the Death Star on fire...

That's just the radiance of him making it fully armed and operational.

you're wrong too.

here is Krok's grammatically correct signature.

"There have been a lot of things I couldn't have cared less about even when I should have cared."

(there might also be a comma between about and even, but I tend to throw in comma's that aren't necessary, so I'm not sure about that.)

I think he's just about to fire his proton torpedo into it's exhaust port.

#1. Isn't there a rule against drunk posting?

&

#2. True, the Empire is the complete opposite of a representative democracy. However, the Galactic Senate which predated the Empire had the democracy, the Rebal Alliance made no such claim. It was assumed not stated.

Finally...

#3. The Empire could be called a democratic system. An alteration on a quote from a work by Terry Pratchett changing Patrician to Emperor: "One man, one vote. The Emperor's the Man, so he gets the Vote."

There's a rule against "drunk posting" but no rule against posting while you are drunk.

Ahhh... gotcha...

oh, wait, no I don't. What? Maybe I'm missing something but I don't get the difference. Someone care to whip out the Massassi Glossary for me and explain it?

You can post while intoxicated, but not if you are posting ABOUT being intoxicated, or if your post is impossible to understand. However, your post CAN be impossible to understand if you are NOT intoxicated.

Ahhh... OK, now I believe I do get it.



I think Brian proved that one with the thread opener.