BobTheMasher
Of what, we don't want to know.y
Posts: 4,243
You know, I personally would never hurt something for fun, but I have a hard time understanding the moral outrage over throwing a tree rat a dozen yards. It's a tree rat. May I ask what your dividing line of compassion is? Is this the same or less outrageous than hurting, say....a dog? A Horse? Is it size related? What about a fish? A crab? A spider? Flies? Where is the dividing line at which point harming something for fun, or because it's annoying, or for some sort of gain of money or food or what have you, becomes wrong?
Edit: I don't mean this in an accusatory manner, I'm just interested to hear peoples' personal limits. I went deer hunting for the first time last week, and I killed a doe (butchered her myself, too, successfully, if a little inefficiently and without professional quality results. learned a lot though). For me, killing something to eat it, even if you don't NEED the food desperately, is fine. I know people who will kill things for being annoying or disruptive, or a nuisance. I can't do that. Most young people I meet these days act like they think harming anything at all is wrong....but they'll smash the hell out of any kind of bug. It's just interesting to me.