I would vote for either Barrack Obama or Ron Paul for the very same reason. I don't think they're either bad people, or effective enough for their most extreme ideals to become policy. The difference is that I think the world would be a better place if Obama was right about people, and would hate it if the most extreme parts of libertarianism were a reality. This means that I'll probably be voting for Obama, but I genuinely just don't know. I don't like voting for people who I don't believe will actually do anything substantial, and the only reason I pick Obama is because his type of ineffectual is the least damaging. I think there are probably more qualified people that understand our economy better, and would not see things in black and white, party-influenced talking points. I imagine someone out there would actually like to try to improve things with tested methodology. I suppose that's the issue though, isn't it? Who's idea of improvement do we go by?
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ