I'm sure that everyone here has failed a major class b/c of those scantron tests even though you studied, right?
I've heard from a good source that there is a weakness in the scantron machines that can be used to keep the machine from marking you wrong. *This information is presented as neutrally factual and is not a condonement of cheating, b/c you are not really cheating. It is not cheating to know how the scantron machine works instead of just sitting there like every other hapless mark in your class. Use at your own risk, and I am not responsible for any mishaps that may occur*
As you all know, there are two types of scantron forms: the kind with the round bubbles and the kind with the square bubbles.
The grading machine uses the ability to discern between light and dark while grading. If the space corresponding to the correct answer is dark, the machine will grade it correct. If the correct answer space is unfilled, the machine marks it wrong. It's a binary system-- on or off are the only two possible conditions as far as the machine is concerned.
However, you are lucky. You're smarter than any damn scantron machine b/c you know of a third way. Why can't it be dark and light at the same time, thus confusing the machine?
Here's how you can pull this seeming paradox on the machine:
1: the way that works for both styles of scantron is to lightly shade in a bubble. Do it very lightly, but dark enough to be visible. This way is covert b/c it looks like an erased answer to the average idiot teacher.
It works b/c the machine doesn't know how to respond to this. it detects pencil lead, but not enough for a definite answer. It responds to this by ignoring the question and not subtracting it from the score.
2. the second way only works on the forms with the rectangular bubbles, but is much more reliable than the first. Simply fill a bubble with diagonal lines. (it works like before, the machine detects both filled and unfilled, so it ignores it) This is fail-safe in deceiving the machine, but it may look suspicious to a teacher. Use with discretion.
Understand that by telling you this, I'm not encouraging cheating. Cheating is when you copy from someone elses scantron b/c you were too damn lazy to study. This method is simply exploiting a weakness that the scantron designers failed to fix. You are simply using every resource that you have available. Theres nothing wrong with that. Use this method on questions that you are not sure about. I still recommend that you crack the books before exams, this is just to keep you from missing the stuff that you forget in the ridiculously stupid high-pressure test environments.
[I haven't really tested this thoroughly, but when a question has you over the barrel on your next exam, what do oyu have to lose by trying it, right? [img]http://forums.massassi.net/html/biggrin.gif[/img] ]
------------------
Most people regard me as the dark and immoral side of Massassi. At least I'm getting what I want out of life.
[This message has been edited by Pagewizard_YKS (edited January 10, 2004).]
I've heard from a good source that there is a weakness in the scantron machines that can be used to keep the machine from marking you wrong. *This information is presented as neutrally factual and is not a condonement of cheating, b/c you are not really cheating. It is not cheating to know how the scantron machine works instead of just sitting there like every other hapless mark in your class. Use at your own risk, and I am not responsible for any mishaps that may occur*
As you all know, there are two types of scantron forms: the kind with the round bubbles and the kind with the square bubbles.
The grading machine uses the ability to discern between light and dark while grading. If the space corresponding to the correct answer is dark, the machine will grade it correct. If the correct answer space is unfilled, the machine marks it wrong. It's a binary system-- on or off are the only two possible conditions as far as the machine is concerned.
However, you are lucky. You're smarter than any damn scantron machine b/c you know of a third way. Why can't it be dark and light at the same time, thus confusing the machine?
Here's how you can pull this seeming paradox on the machine:
1: the way that works for both styles of scantron is to lightly shade in a bubble. Do it very lightly, but dark enough to be visible. This way is covert b/c it looks like an erased answer to the average idiot teacher.
It works b/c the machine doesn't know how to respond to this. it detects pencil lead, but not enough for a definite answer. It responds to this by ignoring the question and not subtracting it from the score.
2. the second way only works on the forms with the rectangular bubbles, but is much more reliable than the first. Simply fill a bubble with diagonal lines. (it works like before, the machine detects both filled and unfilled, so it ignores it) This is fail-safe in deceiving the machine, but it may look suspicious to a teacher. Use with discretion.
Understand that by telling you this, I'm not encouraging cheating. Cheating is when you copy from someone elses scantron b/c you were too damn lazy to study. This method is simply exploiting a weakness that the scantron designers failed to fix. You are simply using every resource that you have available. Theres nothing wrong with that. Use this method on questions that you are not sure about. I still recommend that you crack the books before exams, this is just to keep you from missing the stuff that you forget in the ridiculously stupid high-pressure test environments.
[I haven't really tested this thoroughly, but when a question has you over the barrel on your next exam, what do oyu have to lose by trying it, right? [img]http://forums.massassi.net/html/biggrin.gif[/img] ]
------------------
Most people regard me as the dark and immoral side of Massassi. At least I'm getting what I want out of life.
[This message has been edited by Pagewizard_YKS (edited January 10, 2004).]