this has been digging at my mind since yesterday. but i figure it's really geeky when you think of it. it's a simple question actually.
take a 7#9 chord. it has 1 3 5 b7 #9.
#9 = the minor third.
logically, wouldn't you be refer to the intervals as 1 b3 5 b7 b11 ? so it would become a min7b11 chord. which is just a bit more complicated even though it has the same notes and same root.. (unless i got lost somewhere)
and it's really strange when you switch the intervals so it goes (example )
E G D G# in order instead of E G# D G
it sounds HORRIBLE.
obviously in the proper context it would work (even then, doubtful). i'd say that it's a strictly major type chord and that since the major third is an important tone in there, you just can't picture the #9 as a minor third since it'll mess up the entire voicing.
I think this is appropriate:
take a 7#9 chord. it has 1 3 5 b7 #9.
#9 = the minor third.
logically, wouldn't you be refer to the intervals as 1 b3 5 b7 b11 ? so it would become a min7b11 chord. which is just a bit more complicated even though it has the same notes and same root.. (unless i got lost somewhere)
and it's really strange when you switch the intervals so it goes (example )
E G D G# in order instead of E G# D G
it sounds HORRIBLE.
obviously in the proper context it would work (even then, doubtful). i'd say that it's a strictly major type chord and that since the major third is an important tone in there, you just can't picture the #9 as a minor third since it'll mess up the entire voicing.
I think this is appropriate:
"NAILFACE" - spe