Your "weakness" argument is moot considering you post your poetry, and then deny criticism. It'd be different if we discovered your poetry on your personal website and called you out on it, but you actually ask us for our opinion, and then degrade it because we're internet people, and our opinions don't matter.
There is an objective observation pertaining to effective language. The minute you accept that your writing is **** (this is something all writers must learn to admit), and that there is an infinite potential for improvement, you can succeed as a writer, and learn the intricacies of language.
"How can you judge poetry, man" is the exact reason I hate teaching poetry to high-school seniors. You get the same in college level creative writing class, but then you can tell them that they're horrible poets and that they should drop out without looking back. 9th graders, amazingly, grasp the concept of objective language with subjective interpretation better than some scholars.
Why I'm still posting: This applies to music, visual art, design, and cave drawings. It's why people criticize your beloved SOAD. It's why people criticize you as a person. You're constantly full up on your own sense of art, and the Ad Populum fallacy that justifies that arrogance.
I don't think you're allowed to pick and choose which kinds of criticism you get in which threads you post when you boast artistic liberties like that. You should expect these kinds of arguments. Instead of being apologetic, maybe you can embrace them, and become a more open person.
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ