Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Are you grammatically correct?
12
Are you grammatically correct?
2003-12-11, 2:55 PM #41
I got 8/10. I missed the ones about lay/lied/laid and were.

*Cough*
*Shift eyes left*

------------------
All the prism in the world couldn't make hue.

[This message has been edited by Vincent Valentine (edited December 11, 2003).]
2003-12-11, 2:58 PM #42
what the kaking kak.... 2/10
i must have real messed but use of English, becuase today we had one for school, and guess what, I failed it...

------------------
" You killed me. That wasn't very nice."
Noble Gases
Holy soap opera Batman. - FGR
DARWIN WILL PREVENT THE DOWNFALL OF OUR RACE. - Rob
Free Jin!
2003-12-11, 5:04 PM #43
I got a 7/10. Errr!

-- SavageX

------------------
"...and if you don't like that, then you need to be slugged in the face repeatedly, until my hands are soaked in blood. Have a nice day!"
http://www.savagex.net
The cake is a lie... THE CAKE IS A LIE!!!!!
2003-12-11, 5:58 PM #44
10/10. Yay.
2003-12-11, 9:16 PM #45
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Pagewizard_YKS:
Has anyone ever wondered why things like double negatives, ebonics, etc. are still considered to be "wrong" even though they have become commonplace? We still understand the meaning of so-called bad grammar, so why is it considered wrong? If you used proper english today, you would sound like a snob.

Furthermore, who decides what is correct and incorrect, and why the hell should we care what they say?

The language should be updated based on how people speak in day to day life. The world is evolving, and our language should also evolve to reflect the times.

</font>


The problem with that is that is loss of meaning. For instance, recently there's been a trend to use "they" and "them" as gender-neutral equivilants of the singular pronouns "he/she" and "him/her" (heck, I do it too). The difficulty is, now you're using the same word for both plural and singular pronouns, and confusion arises.

Standardised grammar provides a sort of restraint on the self-destructive tendancies of modern language. Without it, language would constantly be in a state of flux, where meaning could change from one day to the next, and then nobody would be able to communicate effectively.

But then, I'm a writer. I'm biased. [http://forums.massassi.net/html/wink.gif]

/me shuffles back to the ISB.

------------------
5=(x-(x-5))
where x = infinity
So sayest the Writer of Silly Things!
2003-12-11, 9:19 PM #46
Oh, and, um, I got 8/10. They tricked me with that me/I one, they did. And I stand by "is" in Question 7. Maybe "were" is correct, but by Jove, so is "is"!
So sayest the Writer of Silly Things!
2003-12-11, 9:30 PM #47
7/10. I agree with the Viking. Thankfully, there were no long paragraphs to keep tenses straight. I suck with tenses. They should go to hell and die.

------------------
Check out the following stories over at the Interactive Story Board:
The Never-ending Story Thread or visit the new webcomic version!
The Vision Cycle series
Featured Story: Dead
The Plothole: a home for amateur, inclusive, collaborative stories
http://forums.theplothole.net
2003-12-11, 10:00 PM #48
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Apophis:
Anmd Krokodile: Unless English isnt your first language or you took this test very late at night what the heck were you thinking ? Lied ??? jeez....</font>


Yeah, I, uh...sort of always thought it were (tee hee hee!) "I lie down -> I lied down". [http://forums.massassi.net/html/frown.gif] (I know that "lied" is the past tense of "lie", as in say something contrary to truth, I just thought it applied to this as well.)

Anyway, I thought you knew that Finnish is my first language. [http://forums.massassi.net/html/tongue.gif]

------------------
<A HREF="http://www.rot13.com" TARGET=_blank>Wnav "Xebxb" Ghbzvara
w_ghbzvara@yhhxxh.pbz</A>
Looks like we're not going down after all, so nevermind.
2003-12-12, 12:48 AM #49
7/10. Me English bad? Thats unpossible! [http://forums.massassi.net/html/smile.gif]
2003-12-12, 6:11 AM #50
Quote:
<font face="Verdana, Arial" size="2">Originally posted by Flexor:
10/10 and it's not even my first language [http://forums.massassi.net/html/tongue.gif]

</font>


Actually, you learning English as a second (or third or whatever) language CAN be a great advantage (assuming that you don't speak English at home?). I speak Norwegian as my first language, and we speak it at home; we never speak English at home. So all the English I know is the English that's been taught to me at school, whereas everyone else would pick it up from their parents. With that, though, they would pick up all the mistakes that the parents would have in their speech, and become easily confused between the English they've learnt from home and grammatically correct school-taught English. However, if you don't speak English at home you avoid that completely, and speak English completely unfettered by your parents' mistakes in their speech!
Not only that, if you are fairly mathmatically minded you may find the study of linguistics much easier, as you can compare the grammar between the two languages and learn English grammar much quicker.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
12

↑ Up to the top!