Quote:
Originally posted by nottheking
That is just so funny, though it was made a little too obvious how much the alleged... Actions didn't take place at all. Of course, most people wouldn't notice the pair of pants being worn by the "model". And almost everyone would forget that to make an impression in the dust like that, the "model" would have to be face-down. Not only would the form of sex implied be rarer, it also would be a far less comfortable position to lie face-down (or holding your head up). Additionaly, she would be lying too far up the car hood, as whoever'd be the "accomplice" would have to bend forward quite a bit, pressing themselves against the front of the car. Lastly, it appears as if she hasn't completely taken off her shirt, as evidenced by the ruffled apearance in the dust at the top half.
That is just so funny, though it was made a little too obvious how much the alleged... Actions didn't take place at all. Of course, most people wouldn't notice the pair of pants being worn by the "model". And almost everyone would forget that to make an impression in the dust like that, the "model" would have to be face-down. Not only would the form of sex implied be rarer, it also would be a far less comfortable position to lie face-down (or holding your head up). Additionaly, she would be lying too far up the car hood, as whoever'd be the "accomplice" would have to bend forward quite a bit, pressing themselves against the front of the car. Lastly, it appears as if she hasn't completely taken off her shirt, as evidenced by the ruffled apearance in the dust at the top half.
wow...
And just 'cuz the hypothetical dude was hypothetically behind her doesn't mean it was hypothetical butt sex (I can say that, right? it was posted earlier in the thread so I'm going with it)
hmm I need sleep...