Of course that'd be evil. For Pete's sake, where the hell do you get off accusing me of such blatant double standards when you don't know me at all? I think you have a problem with categorizing everyone who disagrees with you as belonging to the same ideological background. To debate, you have to understand that different people have very different mindsets and philosophies that govern their decisions, and accusing strangers of mindless jingoism does more to hurt your cause than help it.
I don't believe too many French victims of World War II complained too loudly when the Allies were forced to blow open an apartment with a tank in order to take out some hiding Nazis. I'm still trying to figure out whether you're an all-out pacifist, or you are just opposed to wars when civilians might be accidentally killed by a bomb.
In any case... I don't know what to tell you. As much as I hate cliches, "War is hell". If we are forced to take out some village because terrorists are hiding out in there, then I guess we just have to do what we have to do. If you'd rather wait to have those terrorists come out and blow up a shopping mall in New York, then fine. I'll be sure never to elect you to any position of public service.
Violent citizens of an Iraqi city brutally slaughter some American civilian contractors. Marines are sent in, root out the ringleaders, and the ringleaders are shot. They're supporters come out to cause trouble. The supporters are shot.
Well, I'll let someone with a more strategic mind deal with the proper military response, but it seems to me that if somebody is dead, he'll have a hard time killing more American contractors.
Frustration and hatred... Okay, so that's what leads them to intentionally target civilians for destruction. Why exactly is that not evil?
I suppose a more prevalent question would be: What actions would you consider to be evil? It seems as if you can justify any actions undertaken by anyone.(Save for perhaps the American government. I still haven't decided if you're that single-minded.) If so, then there's absolutely no reason to continue this discussion.
I'm not sure if you're realizing that you're insulting Americans for being brainwashed by the American media and mindlessly supporting Bush, while at the same time you're defending the actions of lunatics because they were brainwashed by their own Arab and European media.
Errm... Alright, I guess I'll just not touch that one...
No, I think it's just that the majority of Americans understand the price of war. Obviously not enough do, because otherwise we wouldn't be having people ***** about the occasional U.S. casualties or the $80+ billion to fund the war effort.
It's interesting to note that more people were killing by carpet bombing raids on Tokyo than were killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki combined. No one accused anyone of being a terrorist, that's just how war is. Maybe one of the major problems with having an enemy who lurks in the shadows and strikes cowardly once every other year or so is that we forget what war is actually like. As horrible as more conventional warfare is, maybe we need to be reminded that war typically isn't happy for
anyone involved.
------------------
Self-righteous people are more sinful than I am.
Self-righteous people are more sinful than I am.