meh, graphics are just eyecandy, seems to me that if the snes still has games much better than the majority of all this new fangled stuff, it isn't gonna be worth my time until i see a noticeable improvement.

explain more please.

No thanks, not when my opinion is that of the majority.

Good luck finding exactly what you want.

I'll probably get it if it ever comes out for PC; no way am I buying an X-Box for one game, especially when I thought the first one was not terribly great. It seems that Bungie have learnt their lessons, though, so 2 should be better. I still fear for their level design, though. Marathon had some pretty shocking levels that were totally unrealistic in every way. Halo was a bit more realistic, but still terribly boring... The city level I saw in the Halo trailer looks pretty cool, so I hope they've overcome their curse.

I think the fact that I was totally spoiled for Halo didn't help when I finally played it, though. I do like a story-based game, and it's just not as good when you already know what's going to happen.

...but the majority dont care, you're just wussing out, i need more explaining.

The city level is INDEED quite awesome--it feels more like a realistic military excursion than most games I've played. Co-Op the game just can't be beat. Multiplayer...meh. Fun, but to me, the first still wins.

Spe--you're the only one that is here "OMG HALO 2 IS LIKE EVERYTHING ELSE TELL ME WHY IT'S NOT"

Play it, then rate it.

well why didn't you just say that in the first place

Looking forward to it, because my friend is getting it.

Besides, it'll keep me busy while waiting for HL2. :p

I think several of us have, just not in those exact words.