How Smart Are You? - Discussion Forum - The Massassi Temple Forums Archive

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

How Smart Are You?

2005-08-03, 5:38 AM #41

Baconfish

ALL GLORY TO THE CONTEST WINNER

Posts: 18,004

Originally posted by Freelancer:

For the reasons Argath mentioned, I refuse to take this 'test'. I disagree with IQ tests in general anyway, because they don't really quantifiably measure anything that could be considered 'intelligence'.

Last time I checked, IQ was some odd way of measuring how logical you are.

nope.

2005-08-03, 6:19 AM #42

Nikumubeki

NIKVMVS-REX-TODOA

Posts: 17,541

[http://www.telephoneart.com/celebrity/!smartph.gif]

Star Wars: TODOA | DXN - Deus Ex: Nihilum

2005-08-03, 3:45 PM #43

AKPiggott

Grandmaster of Cool

Posts: 1,252

125, 88 pattern recognition.

Xbox Live/PlayStation Network/Steam: tone217
http://twitter.com/ourmatetone

2005-08-03, 4:08 PM #44

Matterialize

Registered User

Posts: 793

156, 88 pattern recog

"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so."

2005-08-03, 4:26 PM #45

Antony

(Still) On 13 week vacation
LAWL

Posts: 10,289

I don't generally take internet IQ tests, but I know I have an actual IQ score of 129. It has been a long time since I took the test, but I hear you IQ does not fluctuate.

>>untie shoes

2005-08-03, 4:32 PM #46

Koobie

Registered User

Posts: 7,354

heh, apparently i have 90 IQ with 63 pattern recognition. strangely enough, another online test i took over a year ago (or something) gave me a 160 IQ.

must've been all the drinking. heh.

幻術

2005-08-03, 4:57 PM #47

Martyn

The Daddy

Posts: 9,001

Originally posted by Koobie:

heh, apparently i have 90 IQ with 63 pattern recognition. strangely enough, another online test i took over a year ago (or something) gave me a 160 IQ.

must've been all the drinking. heh.

Mwuhahahah

My drunk score > your drunk score

epenis ++

2005-08-03, 6:14 PM #48

SF_GoldG_01

Comma king

Posts: 4,841

IQ SCORE: 124
Recognition pattern 88...

Interesting...

Nothing to see here, move along.

2005-08-03, 11:42 PM #49

Nightwind

Inadequate Member

Posts: 847

147 (done fast), and 88% pattern recognition.

The man in black fled across the desert, and the Gunslinger followed...

2005-08-04, 12:35 AM #50

ProdigyOddigy

He's such a CutieWutie

Posts: 628

The test is broken. I re-took it an answered no on the "a tree can hold three people and blah blah" and got 100%. From logic, a tree that can hold 3 people should be able to hold three people. They didn't mention anything about how strong the tree was(they didn't even say that three people was the maximum!) and exactly how heavy the people were relative to an ideal tree-sitting person. From logic, it would be a trick question and the answer is yes. So much for measuring logic I guess.

/END OF OVER-ANALYSIS

visit my project

"I wonder to myself. Why? Simply why? Why why? Why do I ask why? Why do I need to find out why? Why do I have to ask why as a question? Why is why always used to find out why? Why is the answer to why always why? Why is there no final answer to why? Simply why not? Holy cow, this is pretty deep, meaningful **** I wrote. Glad I wrote it down. Oh man."
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ [slog], Echoman

2005-08-04, 1:47 AM #51

Malus

Insert Custom Title Here

Posts: 1,180

147 and 100%. Probably not very accurate, but still fun anyway.

[This message has been edited. Deal with it.]

2005-08-04, 1:52 AM #52

Freelancer

Peelancer

Posts: 15,012

Prodigy, I interpreted that question to mean, "3 AVERAGE people".

So if you have someone that weighs 150 pounds, and a person that weighs twice as much and a person that weighs half as much, the answer is that the branch can not support those three people.

150 X 3 = 450 lbs., which is the maximum weight the branch can support.
150 + 300 (i.e. 150 X 2) + 75 (i.e. 150 / 2) > 450, thus the answer is false.

Is it weird that that question only took me like 3 seconds to figure out when I was taking the test? :p But those ones where like "a gork is better than a bonkly and a burz is worse than a popo. Is a popo better than a phuz?" questions, I don't have any flippin' idea, even after wasting precious minutes on them, so I just guess.

"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009

2005-08-04, 2:38 AM #53

BobTheMasher

Of what, we don't want to know.y

Posts: 4,243

You guys all make me feel stupid. 150 and 100% pattern recognition.

Warhead[97]

2005-08-04, 2:40 AM #54

Freelancer

Peelancer

Posts: 15,012

Huh? That's one of the higher scores...

"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009

2005-08-04, 3:19 AM #55

Acharjay

Quick! Someone call a doctor!g

Posts: 2,498

Hahaha what a ridiculous test.

149 with 100% pattern recognition.

While listening to Metallica blaring.

"Well ain't that a merry jelly." - FastGamerr

"You can actually see the waves of me not caring in the air." - fishstickz

2005-08-04, 3:36 AM #56

Deadman

twitches

Posts: 6,222

"How smart are you?"
Smart enough to know this is a waste of time.
Not that I don't enjoy a good waste of time, but this isn't my idea of a fun waste of time.

You can't judge a book by it's file size

2005-08-04, 6:00 AM #57

Recusant

Prefered by 80% of Doctors

Posts: 1,480

Man, I'm bored: scored 161, 100% pattern recog

Considering the number of people here who've taken that incredibly long geek test before, this one didn't seem that bad.