Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Speed of light sped up!
12345
Speed of light sped up!
2005-09-01, 10:33 AM #161
Originally posted by Martyn:
There has been plenty of scientific experiment into the nature of gravity you muppet: read a book! There is a reason that there are laws such as Keppler's Planetary motion laws and laws like F = (G*m1*m1)/r^2 and that is that they have been proven by experiment and by derivation from first principles to hold true!

GAAAAAAHH!!


As far as we can tell. Again, many of the scientfic "truths" that people have clinged to in the past have been later proven false (largely by technological advances).

Originally posted by Emon:
What you just said is that the air pressure across the surface of the object causes changes in elasticity and tension, which sends signals to your brain that the object must be "heavy"?


In short, yes...but now how you [mis]represent it. Atm. Pressure, Temperature, Density, and the Vertical Component of Magnitism causes the object to compress (at the microscopic level) from the top to the bottom. As the compression continues through to the the bottom of the object, it then begins acting apon the top of your hands. When this occurs, your hands being to stretch downward from your wrist, your wrist then from your elbow, and your elbow then to your shoulder. This occurs over a period t. As the tension (that we just demonstrated) increases (due to the constant effects on the object), and your molecules begin to stretch futher and futher from each other, you nervous system send a signal to your brain letting you know that this is occuring (in the form of pulses). Our brain, being fully aware of what we are doing (or attempting to do), translates these pulsed signals as "strain."

Originally posted by Emon:
What the **** are you talking about? The reason things feel heavy is because of the strain on your muscles. How do you muscles get strained? When a FORCE acts on them. The reason something seems lighter to a stronger fellow is because his muscles are larger and more dense and more capable of counteracting the FORCE against them. What's the force in this situation? F = mg! Which is nothing but F = ma! The force the object is creating on you (or the palm of your hands, let's say you're carrying a box) is equal to the mass times the acceleration, which is 9.81 m/s^2 in this situation. F = MA. F EQUALS M GOD DAMN A. NOTHING ELSE. F NEVER EQUALS MV. NEVER. EVER. EVER. EVER. The force your muscles creates is equal to that Force. Why? BECAUSE THE BOX ISN'T FALLING WHEN YOU'RE HOLDING IT.


Notice your own logical fallacy?

'Why is the force your muscle creates equal to the force of the box? Because the box isn't falling when you're holding it.'

There is no explination in there that suggests WHY the so called "forces" are equal. Only that 'they have to be because the box isn't falling.'

Save for Magnetic "forces" (which are a property of magnetism, and not really a Newtonian "Force"), show me what a force looks like. Describe it for me. Just a "Force" by itself, not as a function.

Show me Time. What is it made of? What is it's composition? If it can be manipulated as Relativity suggest, it must be composed of something, else how could it be effected? On the same point, what is the Magical Connectio between Time and Light? Light must be a lot more powerful then we though if, when bent or otherwise distorted, it effects time...or better still, "space-time."

How about mass (not as a function of an object)? It's composition?

Length (and no, demonstrating that something has length is not the same thing)?

How about Potential and Kinetic Energy? Compisition? Chemical makeup?

These (among others) are concepts. They are great for the Mathematical aspect of science, but does little to help people understand what truly, physically, causes things to happen the way they do.

Give me any example from any areaof physics and I can logically explain it without the either the use of them (Force,energy, and others) or bending them (as concepts: time, mass, and length).
"The solution is simple."
2005-09-01, 10:36 AM #162
Originally posted by Emon:
Of course it was incorrect. Air pressure is the result of gravity, not the other way around. What do you think causes the air to stick to our rock? Gravity. Durr.


As I have already stated (several times now), gravity can (apparently) be best explained the the results of Atm. Pressure, Temperature, Density, and the Vertical Component of Magnetism.
"The solution is simple."
2005-09-01, 4:09 PM #163
NOOOOO

You claim this BS about gravity being a function of density and magnestism and temperature, you offer a little bit of thought proof, shoddily thought through, and then challenge us on centuries of study on gravity and its principles!?

Are you ****ing nuts?!

How did Johannes Keppler accurately predict the motion of the planets in our solar system HUNDREDS of years ago using gravitational theory? BY BEING RIGHT. Use your crappy theories to better predict the motions of the solar system and maybe someone will take you seriously.

Until you have proof that the theories which provide the very infrastructure you rely on to post on these forums (and by that I mean the notion of FORCES, which provide the basis of ENGINEERING which hold up the buildings and pylons which carry the information to the 'net) are false and that EVERYONE ELSE IN THE WORLD EVER IS WRONG you can TAKE YOUR RETARDED THEORIES AND SHOVE THEM WHERE THE SUN DON'T SHINE, and drop your indignant attitude, because you are being a self important ****.

EVERYONE ELSE IS RIGHT AND YOU ARE WRONG.

And when I say that, I mean that:

In my job (Engineering) if I come up with an answer to a problem that no-one has contemplated, I take it to review among my peers, because 99 times out of 100 someone has had the same idea in the past, and had it reviewed, and found to be lacking. You have the problem of not listening when more experienced people tell you that you are talking out of your arse.
2005-09-02, 11:46 AM #164
Originally posted by CaptBevvil:
As I have already stated (several times now), gravity can (apparently) be best explained the the results of Atm. Pressure, Temperature, Density, and the Vertical Component of Magnetism.


Can you explain this please? I'm lost
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
■■■■■■■■
enshu
2005-09-02, 12:07 PM #165
Thanks to an e-mail from another forum member (who will remain nameless) whom has graciously provided me with enough (logical) proof to prove all of my theories on Velocital Physics and hypothesis on Gravity to be terribly incorrect. I appologize for getting everyone stirred up for (apparently) no good reason. I concede my points and gadly retract them.
"The solution is simple."
2005-09-02, 1:40 PM #166
*Wonders what's going on in thread* Oooh a flame war. Oh, it's more than four pages long.

Massassi Axiam: Every thread in the Massassi forums that becomes greater than or equal to four pages in length will descend into a flame war.
2005-09-02, 1:47 PM #167
Although it confounds me how all these pages of argument could not do what a private message did, I'm glad it's over.
Warhead[97]
2005-09-02, 3:12 PM #168
I want to know this mysterious person and what he provided.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2005-09-02, 3:51 PM #169
Yes, me too, JG. i wonder what trumped the proofs and arguments of at least five extreamly capable people, including a physics post-grad. Ah, well.
The above post may contain traces of sarcasm, cynicism, outright insults, and sadistic tendencies. You have been warned.
2005-09-02, 10:58 PM #170
Why do I get the feeling he posted that only to shut us up?
Bassoon, n. A brazen instrument into which a fool blows out his brains.
2005-09-03, 4:30 PM #171
Originally posted by CaptBevvil:
Thanks to an e-mail from another forum member (who will remain nameless) whom has graciously provided me with enough (logical) proof to prove all of my theories on Velocital Physics and hypothesis on Gravity to be terribly incorrect. I appologize for getting everyone stirred up for (apparently) no good reason. I concede my points and gadly retract them.



Halle-swearword-luja.
2005-09-03, 8:35 PM #172
Captain, for all the crap you posted, I can't believe you did it so well. Not a single insult, underhanded-comment, or anything. Bravo. You may have been stubborn but at least you had tact.
That painting was a gift, Todd. I'm taking it with me.
2005-09-03, 11:34 PM #173
And so ends one of the more interesting threads I've had the pleasure of reading.
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2005-09-03, 11:40 PM #174
I'm going to have to agree with Emon.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-09-04, 12:38 PM #175
I can't believe this thread was still going till yesterday...

I've just got back from holiday and the thread has only just come to a conclusion...scary.

well at least we have an end and the thread didn't develope totally into a flame war, would love to see the contents of the PM message though....
People of our generation should not be subjected to mornings.

Rbots
2005-09-04, 1:40 PM #176
.........wow. Just wow. I'm glad that I got to be there when it all started. But I don't see why he would've brought the mystery massassian into this, just to cede the argument. He could've just said "alright, I give, you guys win". I believe him.
"Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so."
12345

↑ Up to the top!