Massassi Forums Logo

This is the static archive of the Massassi Forums. The forums are closed indefinitely. Thanks for all the memories!

You can also download Super Old Archived Message Boards from when Massassi first started.

"View" counts are as of the day the forums were archived, and will no longer increase.

ForumsDiscussion Forum → Read: I can't stand useless people
123
Read: I can't stand useless people
2005-09-05, 12:22 PM #41
The threads that are genuinely useless are those that don't spark debate or discussion. The threads that start with "NO DEBATE!" or "NO DISCUSSION!", or the ones that go:
"Oh man, dude x died"
"I didn't particularly like dude x"
"WHAT! THIS IS NOT THE PLACE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF THE LIFE OF DUDE X. THIS IS A THREAD FOR COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS CONDOLENCES TO SHOW COMPLETELY SUPERFICIAL UNITY FOR A COMPLETELY OFFENSIVE DEGRADATION OF DUDE X AS AN INDIVIDUAL."


It is those threads that are useless, need to be closed, and the thread starters banned.
"Post your ..." threads are bordering on the acceptable, but those that end with ".. oh and to make this thread legal, post your ..." are thoroughly useless because without that addition, the thread probably would have sparked some discussion, but was purposefully corrupted in favour of another completely useless 'list' thread.
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
2005-09-05, 12:30 PM #42
I suspect your social life is pretty bad. :p
Catloaf, meet mouseloaf.
My music
2005-09-05, 12:34 PM #43
Originally posted by jEDIkIRBY:
Than you're really not seeing the point. Just because you don't find it useful doesn't mean it doesn't help the situation. It's not a negative post, nor is it a post to flame bait anyone else. In fact, your post is more similar to the sort of useless thing I see at massassi daily. "someone elses post is dumb and stupid and wrong hahaha"


Sometimes I think some people take Massassi too seriously.
2005-09-05, 5:16 PM #44
Originally posted by Mort-Hog:
The threads that are genuinely useless are those that don't spark debate or discussion. The threads that start with "NO DEBATE!" or "NO DISCUSSION!", or the ones that go:
"Oh man, dude x died"
"I didn't particularly like dude x"
"WHAT! THIS IS NOT THE PLACE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF THE LIFE OF DUDE X. THIS IS A THREAD FOR COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS CONDOLENCES TO SHOW COMPLETELY SUPERFICIAL UNITY FOR A COMPLETELY OFFENSIVE DEGRADATION OF DUDE X AS AN INDIVIDUAL."


It is those threads that are useless, need to be closed, and the thread starters banned.
"Post your ..." threads are bordering on the acceptable, but those that end with ".. oh and to make this thread legal, post your ..." are thoroughly useless because without that addition, the thread probably would have sparked some discussion, but was purposefully corrupted in favour of another completely useless 'list' thread.

If I followed such guidelines, I will be closing threads every waking hour.

The reason we all "scream" NO DEBATE is because we are all afraid that a debate will turn flamewar. History tells us that a good number of debates end up flamewars. Boriqua's Katrina thread is the latest example.
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2005-09-05, 8:17 PM #45
Interesting. I just came across this thread. I can see where some might think me responsible for flamebaiting. I usually intend to spark debate with some of my comments but I know that some members will take it further. The political and socialogical threads really are the ones that interest me most even though I came by this place because of JK. I think it's a slippery slope to simply say that someone should be banned for being "useless". I agree if the sum total of their posts are things like "***" and "OMG liek ***** wins". Maybe flamebaiting if it is so bad as to be insulting. Still, if someone is so easily baited that they insult others and bring a thread down with it maybe they should be the target. I think I've had my share of insults directed at me and I do my best to refrain from returning them in kind. I always get a little discouraged to see how people will make petty, personalized attacks on others. Then I wonder if I'm just not taking an internet forum too serious.

Really, is it just too hard to treat others with respect? Even on a forum?
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2005-09-05, 11:43 PM #46
Originally posted by JediGandalf:
If I followed such guidelines, I will be closing threads every waking hour.

The reason we all "scream" NO DEBATE is because we are all afraid that a debate will turn flamewar. History tells us that a good number of debates end up flamewars. Boriqua's Katrina thread is the latest example.


What were you expecting? A whole thread full of 'unhappy' smilies?
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
2005-09-06, 5:04 AM #47
This thread sucks.
D E A T H
2005-09-06, 9:30 AM #48
Originally posted by Mort-Hog:
A whole thread full of 'unhappy' smilies?


:(
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2005-09-06, 9:47 AM #49
Originally posted by Mort-Hog:
The threads that are genuinely useless are those that don't spark debate or discussion. The threads that start with "NO DEBATE!" or "NO DISCUSSION!", or the ones that go:
"Oh man, dude x died"
"I didn't particularly like dude x"
"WHAT! THIS IS NOT THE PLACE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE EVALUATION OF THE LIFE OF DUDE X. THIS IS A THREAD FOR COMPLETELY MEANINGLESS CONDOLENCES TO SHOW COMPLETELY SUPERFICIAL UNITY FOR A COMPLETELY OFFENSIVE DEGRADATION OF DUDE X AS AN INDIVIDUAL."


It is those threads that are useless, need to be closed, and the thread starters banned.
"Post your ..." threads are bordering on the acceptable, but those that end with ".. oh and to make this thread legal, post your ..." are thoroughly useless because without that addition, the thread probably would have sparked some discussion, but was purposefully corrupted in favour of another completely useless 'list' thread.



Exactly.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-09-06, 1:39 PM #50
Hmm...this divides my opinion. I'm all for banning people, but I'm also all for useless chaotic out-of-control debates.
2005-09-06, 1:43 PM #51
As long as blunt "You're wrong, haha, you suck. *repeate swearing*" posts aren't made, so am I.
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2005-09-06, 2:15 PM #52
You just know that someone will reply to you with "You're wrong, haha, you suck. *repeate swearing*", so I shall mock them all before they do!
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. " - Bertrand Russell
The Triumph of Stupidity in Mortals and Others 1931-1935
2005-09-06, 2:24 PM #53
Originally posted by jEDIkIRBY:
As long as blunt "You're wrong, haha, you suck. *repeate swearing*" posts aren't made, so am I.

YOU'RE WRONG LOL YOU SUCK!

*bans self*
Code to the left of him, code to the right of him, code in front of him compil'd and thundered. Programm'd at with shot and $SHELL. Boldly he typed and well. Into the jaws of C. Into the mouth of PERL. Debug'd the 0x258.
2005-09-06, 2:27 PM #54
haha
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2005-09-08, 12:25 PM #55
Originally posted by jEDIkIRBY:
There are four? PM me >.> <.<


i'll give you a hint, all four of them posted on this thread.
2005-09-08, 5:04 PM #56
Originally posted by Warlord:
i'll give you a hint, all four of them posted on this thread.


You think four people in this thread should be banned? What for? The paranoid in me would say you include me in the list but I don't think even those who disagree with me in debate threads would include me on that list.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2005-09-08, 5:06 PM #57
I bet I'm on it. I bet I'm on both of Detty's secret lists too.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-09-08, 7:16 PM #58
Originally posted by Freelancer:
I bet I'm on it. I bet I'm on both of Detty's secret lists too.


It's not something to be proud of.

Me, you, raoul, SAJN, temp, and kirby, probably.
D E A T H
2005-09-08, 10:41 PM #59
SAJN and Kirby? No way. Raoul, maybe. You, yeah. Me, yeah. Ubuu, yeah. Tenshu, possibly. Mort, who knows, Temp, yeah, Obi, probably not (anymore). Okay, on second thought, maybe Kirb. Don't forget Bill, Rob, and Shintock.
"it is time to get a credit card to complete my financial independance" — Tibby, Aug. 2009
2005-09-09, 5:26 AM #60
Originally posted by Freelancer:
SAJN and Kirby? No way. Raoul, maybe. You, yeah. Me, yeah. Ubuu, yeah. Tenshu, possibly. Mort, who knows, Temp, yeah, Obi, probably not (anymore). Okay, on second thought, maybe Kirb. Don't forget Bill, Rob, and Shintock.


Uh...yeah...SAJN and Kirby. Bill isn't ever serious enough to get in trouble, same with Rob, and Shintock sticks to the music forum.
D E A T H
2005-09-09, 7:57 AM #61
SAJN isn't on it.
Detty. Professional Expert.
Flickr Twitter
2005-09-09, 4:39 PM #62
I already know I'm on Detty's list, and we've talked. I also know a majority of the other people on the list. I am ok with being on a list. I don't think I fit any of the complaints Detty's had in this thread.
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2005-09-10, 2:18 PM #63
Of course you don't fit the description. It's much too large for you.
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2005-09-10, 3:36 PM #64
But if you start banning people for saying nonsense... It just won't be massassi anymore would it? It'd turn into a deadly serious debating group. I always thought massassi was a place to have some fun and look at completely random things that well... are fun.

I'm all for banning people who deliberately start flaming, but not for posting useless funny remarks. Because that's the way it seems to be coming across.
Sneaky sneaks. I'm actually a werewolf. Woof.
2005-09-11, 7:39 AM #65
I think Oxyonagon has hit the nail on the head there.
Should people really be banned for throwing in a one-liner?
If their just posting to stir up trouble or be annoying, then sure, reprimand them, ban them, remove their genitalia and nail it to the wall if you want.
But if someones just trying to light up the mood or something, I think banning is a little extreme.
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2005-09-11, 7:42 AM #66
Originally posted by Freelancer:
I bet I'm on it. I bet I'm on both of Detty's secret lists too.



I'm on everyone's secret list.
2005-09-11, 7:55 AM #67
Quote:
SAJN isn't on it.


...but Victor Van Dort is :p

Also, I 100% agree with this:

Quote:
But if you start banning people for saying nonsense... It just won't be massassi anymore would it? It'd turn into a deadly serious debating group. I always thought massassi was a place to have some fun and look at completely random things that well... are fun.

I'm all for banning people who deliberately start flaming, but not for posting useless funny remarks. Because that's the way it seems to be coming across.
Think while it's still legal.
2005-09-11, 8:00 AM #68
I should say this one more time: by "Useless" [from what I and Detty talked about before this thread was made] he's talking about people who don't really contribute anything to a thread *EXCEPT* negative attacks or flames. Useless people doesn't exactly mean "one liners" or "unimportant posts." It means people who are specifically looking to detract from a thread.

"This thread sucks." is a great example.

JediKirby
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2005-09-11, 8:22 AM #69
Originally posted by jEDIkIRBY:
I should say this one more time: by "Useless" [from what I and Detty talked about before this thread was made] he's talking about people who don't really contribute anything to a thread *EXCEPT* negative attacks or flames. Useless people doesn't exactly mean "one liners" or "unimportant posts." It means people who are specifically looking to detract from a thread.

"This thread sucks." is a great example.

JediKirby


Sometimes "This thread sucks" is said with great truth and even a bit of light-heartedness, though. The only examples I can think of that work all the time are things like "OMG U SUCK AND ARE WRONG I'M SO RITE :rolleyes:"
D E A T H
2005-09-11, 8:44 AM #70
You can't have positive without negative.
2005-09-11, 8:52 AM #71
Part of me doesn't mind allowing people to make an *** out of themself. They end up doing more harm for their side of the debate. I wish moderators would specifically scold individuals rather than just closing a thread with some general, blanket admonishment. Plus, a lot of times there is still a very valid debate going on that ends up being lost because an entire thread is closed because of some members choose to simply insult or go into all out defense mode.
"I would rather claim to be an uneducated man than be mal-educated and claim to be otherwise." - Wookie 03:16

2005-09-11, 9:17 AM #72
Heh, sorry JediKirby I guess I wasn't paying enough attention to your previous posts., or I just forgot.

I say ban their useless asses and chuck their names on the ban list. Oh yeah, and BRING BACK THE BAN LIST.
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2005-09-11, 10:13 AM #73
The ban list was fun, but rather trigger happy.
ᵗʰᵉᵇˢᵍ๒ᵍᵐᵃᶥᶫ∙ᶜᵒᵐ
ᴸᶥᵛᵉ ᴼᵑ ᴬᵈᵃᵐ
2005-09-11, 4:45 PM #74
[QUOTE=Dj Yoshi]Uh...yeah...SAJN and Kirby. Bill isn't ever serious enough to get in trouble, same with Rob, and Shintock sticks to the music forum.[/QUOTE]
**** that's not fair. I don't piss people off anymore?
>>untie shoes
2005-09-12, 2:41 AM #75
Aww poor Bill.
*hands Bill some monkey poo*
Fling away friend, fling away.
You can't judge a book by it's file size
2005-09-13, 4:26 PM #76
Originally posted by Matterialize:
Forget random explosions! I vote we use the server to reprogram offenders' DNA via the radiation emitted from their computer screen!!! :D

Anybody get the reference?


Dilbert, f00!
A Knight's Tail
Exile: A Tale of Light in Dark
The Never Ending Story²
"I consume the life essence itself!... Preferably medium rare" - Mauldis

-----@%
2005-09-13, 4:28 PM #77
I'm not on that list. And Detty is lying about SAJN, just so he doesnt feel like a victim. You know how sensitive some people get.
In Tribute to Adam Sliger. Rest in Peace

10/7/85 - 12/9/03
2005-09-13, 4:38 PM #78
I've received a number of e-mails from Detty about my borderline behavior. :(
the idiot is the person who follows the idiot and your not following me your insulting me your following the path of a idiot so that makes you the idiot - LC Tusken
2005-09-13, 5:39 PM #79
i'm not lying about SAJN.
Detty. Professional Expert.
Flickr Twitter
2005-09-13, 7:44 PM #80
Ya you are.
In Tribute to Adam Sliger. Rest in Peace

10/7/85 - 12/9/03
123

↑ Up to the top!